Mr. Chadderdon,
Your point is well taken. The issue before us is not one of “auto-resignation,” but rather of qualification and resulting vacancy.
Article 7, Section 4 states:
“A National Committee member shall be a sustaining member of the Party…”
This language is present tense and continuous. It establishes an ongoing qualification for service on the National Committee.
In prior instances, regional representatives who did not meet this requirement were unable to serve. The region made appointments, those appointments were declined due to failure to meet the qualification, and the region subsequently revoted once the deficiency
was cured.
The same principle applies to a sitting member. Qualification to hold office is determined at all times.
This interpretation is also consistent with prior LNC practice, in which sitting members who ceased to meet the sustaining membership requirement were deemed to have vacated their seats upon confirmation of the lapse.
If at a given moment a member is not a sustaining member, then at that moment the member does not meet the qualification required by Article 7. Subsequent renewal restores eligibility prospectively; it does not retroactively eliminate the period during which
the qualification was not met. To hold otherwise would render eligibility variable and subject to selective enforcement.
The references to RONR concerning members “in arrears” address membership rights within an assembly. They do not govern eligibility to hold an office where the bylaws expressly require a defined qualification. Where bylaws prescribe qualifications for office,
those qualifications control (under RONR, the bylaws are the controlling authority and supersede any conflicting provision of the parliamentary authority).
Accordingly, the Chair rules that failure to meet the ongoing qualification set forth in Article 7 results in a vacancy of the National Committee position upon confirmation of that failure.