FW: Discussion for resolution in support of the DoJ

[lnc-public_forward]

 

---

From: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 12:10:03 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Discussion for resolution in support of the DoJ

Good afternoon, again - 

As with Mr. Martin's non-intervention and "election integrity" resolutions, here's commentary on the DoJ / voter list resolution.

-----

 

WHEREAS, the United States Department of Justice has filed (or is expected to file) multiple lawsuits against election officials in various states—including but not limited to Hawaiʻi (Case No. 1:25-cv-00522), Arizona, New Mexico, Nevada, Virginia, Washington, Colorado, Massachusetts, Delaware, Connecticut, Wisconsin, Georgia, Illinois, Rhode Island, Vermont, Oregon, and others — for denying or restricting access to full statewide voter registration lists, in violation of the public disclosure provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1960, the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA); and

While it’s refreshing to see a Libertarian positively reference the Civil Rights Act, I do not think the federal government has a right to demand voter data from states without properly following procedure.

In the case of Minnesota, the Trump administration has alluded that the ICE invasion is to obtain these records, agreeing to withdraw their attack on the state in exchange for these records.  We should do absolutely nothing to justify, in any way, the deployment of ICE to harass and coerce the people.

 

WHEREAS, these federal statutes impose clear, non-discretionary obligations on state election officials to maintain accurate voter records and make voter registration lists available for public inspection and copying for lawful purposes, including election oversight, integrity verification, and enforcement of voting rights; and

Sure.

 

WHEREAS, numerous state election offices have demonstrated a pattern of noncompliance by refusing or unduly restricting access to these records in response to formal requests from federal authorities and other qualified parties; and

I would argue that the feds simply did not properly request the data. Plus, since when do we trust the feds? I would rather not turn over voter records to the federal government.

 

WHEREAS, such noncompliance fosters secrecy rather than scrutiny, undermining public confidence in elections and eroding the transparency and accountability essential to free and fair democratic processes; and

Again, there is a proper process for getting this data which was not followed by this incompetent administration. Also, are we or are we not concerned about privacy and unreasonable searches?

 

WHEREAS, affiliates of the Libertarian Party in multiple states, as well as individual Libertarians and third-party organizations, have independently sought access to voter registration data to which they are lawfully entitled under state and federal law, only to face repeated denials similar to those challenged by the Department of Justice; and

Is there a federal law mandating that we have access to voter registration? Many states have a mechanism, some requiring that to be accessed via local affiliates. But I do not know of a federal law which gives the LP blanket, uniform access to voter lists.

 

WHEREAS, these denials impair the ability of minor political parties, independent candidates, and citizens to conduct lawful voter outreach, verify registration accuracy, challenge potential irregularities, and participate meaningfully in election oversight; and

There are absolutely hurdles that third parties face, but do they stem from the federal government not getting voter data?

 

WHEREAS, in-state administrative remedies have proven ineffective in many jurisdictions, leaving federal enforcement as a necessary mechanism to secure compliance; and

“leaving federal enforcement as a necessary mechanism?”  Also - do we believe the federal government wishes to ensure Libertarian voters are properly counted and placed on the ballot?

 

WHEREAS, claims that lawful requests for public election records “undermine public trust” invert fundamental principles of open government, as transparency and accountability are the foundations of trust in electoral systems, not obstacles to it;

I do not trust the federal government, nor do I think there’s an issue with states failing to comply with unlawful requests.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Libertarian Party fully supports the U.S. Department of Justice's enforcement actions seeking to compel compliance with federal election record disclosure requirements in non-compliant states, including the lawsuit against the Hawaiʻi Office of Elections and Chief Elections Officer Scott Nago as a prominent example; and

I do not own a My Pillow, nor do I wish to. 

Likewise, I do not wish to back the DoJ on this.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Libertarian Party urges all state election officials to achieve immediate and full compliance with the Civil Rights Act of 1960, the National Voter Registration Act, and the Help America Vote Act, including prompt and unrestricted disclosure of voter registration records as mandated by law; and

Again, refreshing to see the CRA brought up in a positive light – because it largely nullified unjust state and local laws. But, again, if the federal government wanted to audit election laws, they should simply properly request the proper data, not invade states.

 

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Libertarian Party calls upon federal authorities to continue vigorously exercising their jurisdiction to address systemic noncompliance with election transparency and record-access requirements nationwide; and

We cannot resolve on behalf of the Libertarian Party except where it’s been directly stated by delegates at convention. The LNC cannot resolve on behalf of the Party itself.

 

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED, that the Libertarian Party affirms that election integrity is strengthened—not weakened—by lawful public oversight, accountability, and strict adherence to constitutional and statutory obligations governing electoral processes.

Again, we cannot resolve on behalf of the Libertarian Party itself.

-----

Thanks,

Keith Thompson

Region 3 South Rep

[lnc-public_forward]

 

---

From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2026 12:20:49 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: Discussion for resolution in support of the DoJ

Mahalo for your thoughts on this resolution. 

In response, respectfully, I think most of your later questions are actually answered by the first two "whereas" statements: 

First, the reference to federal laws is made to the public disclosure provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1960, the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), and the Help America Vote Act (HAVA). The second statement clarifies the relevant provisions at stake, and further statements then establish legal necessity.

If there's no objection, I'd like to enter Aaron Toman's testimony on this matter into the record: 

"Aloha members of the LNC,

I was made aware of the proposed resolutions being discussed at tonight's Special Monthly Meeting and as I have been personally affected by one of the main issues, I felt that my opinions may carry some weight with your decisions tonight. Please see my following stances in support and against the individual resolutions below:

1. "Resolution in Support of U.S. Department of Justice Enforcement Actions to Compel Disclosure of Statewide Voter Registration Lists"

As a former Libertarian candidate (2024) for the state of Hawaii, the lack of transparency and access to the statewide voter registration lists had a direct impact on not only my own campaign, but the campaigns of all Hawaii candidates. 

This information is crucial to make informed decisions on the campaign trail for locating registered voters, determining ad placements, running effective door knocking, and much more. Without this information, candidates are "shooting in the dark", making educated guesses that may or may not be successful after spending the required money and the precious time from the candidates.

This resolution is an easy way for the LNC to support local candidates across the nation, by helping them to have access to the important information found in their local Voter Registration Lists, that will help all Libertarian candidates run more effective campaigns moving forward.

I do not see this resolution as "controversial" and I encourage the LNC to pass this resolution.

2. "A Resolution Against the Systemic Subversion of Election Integrity and Judicial Refusal to Enforce Transparency"

As a Hawaii resident, the examples listed in this resolution "hit home" for me. I do see this as an active issue in Hawaii that needs to be addressed, but I am not confident that this is a "national issue".

I believe that each state affiliate has a differing opinion on this topic and that this resolution from the LNC being as broad as it is, could have negative effects for certain state affiliates. 

Therefore, it is my belief that the LNC should vote against passing this resolution and instead offer up the text of this resolution to the state affiliates to either use "as-is" or alter them to meet their own specific situations, should they determine that it is the right course of action for their state (I would encourage the Hawaii affiliate to pass such a resolution).

3. "A Resolution Urging Non-Intervention in Foreign Conflicts"

Once again, I don't see this resolution as "controversial" and it aligns with Libertarian philosophy. I believe this resolution only reaffirms our long standing stance and with the current news cycle, it allows us to "reintroduce" ourselves to the "Anti-War" voters across the nation. 

There are voters on both sides of the two party system that are Anti-war and are becoming more and more distant from their former parties. Let's remind them that there truly is an Anti-War party that is ready to welcome them before they make the jump straight to an "independent voter".

I encourage the LNC to pass this resolution.

---

Thank you for your time, I look forward to seeing how these resolutions will be voted on and the potential impacts they will make. 

Mahalo,

Aaron Toman

Former Libertarian Candidate

House of Representatives - Hawaii's District II"

 Mahalo for your kokua to this important matter. 

Austin Martin 

R1

Ua may ke ea o ka ʻāina i ka pono

---

From: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 1, 2026 2:10:03 PM