FW: Minnesota weighs in on LPNH with a Resolution

[lnc-public_forward]

 

---

From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2026 2:52:14 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Cc: Judicial <judi...@lp.org>; rebecca.whiting <rebecca...@lpmn.org>
Subject: Minnesota weighs in on LPNH with a Resolution

Aloha!

In the attached resolution, the Libertarian Party of Minnesota expresses its position on the LPNH matter and affiliate autonomy. 

Please take a moment to consider the statement of the Minnesota Party on current LNC controversies.

Thanks for your prompt attention to this important matter. 

Austin Martin

R1

Ua mau ke ea o ka ʻāina i ka pono

[lnc-public_forward]

 

---

From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2026 4:28:28 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: ken.moellman <ken.mo...@lpstates.com>
Cc: LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>; Judicial <judi...@lp.org>; rebecca.whiting <rebecca...@lpmn.org>
Subject: Re: Minnesota weighs in on LPNH with a Resolution

Aloha, Ken!

This thread is about the Minnesota Party's resolution — and my job is to make their voice heard. I appreciate that you could have reached out to me privately, however, instead, you took the time to confirm that your posture toward states making submissions is not meaningfully different than those who are not. Thank you. 

I will refrain from adding the JC from further correspondence on such matters.

Mahalo, again for clarifying your position. 

Austin Martin

R1

Ua mau ke ea o ka ʻāina i ka pono

---

From: ken.mo...@lpstates.com <ken.mo...@lpstates.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 11, 2026 5:23:13 PM
To: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Cc: LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>; Judicial <judi...@lp.org>; rebecca.whiting <rebecca...@lpmn.org>
Subject: Re: Minnesota weighs in on LPNH with a Resolution

Hi Austin,

Unless this is being submitted as part of an amicus brief by a sustaining member of the national party, or being submitted as part of a supplemental filing by one of LPNH or the LNC, this has no meaning to the Judicial Committee.

Thank you,

Ken Moellman
Chair, Judicial Committee

On 2026-07-11 22:52, Austin Martin wrote:

Aloha!

 

In the attached resolution, the Libertarian Party of Minnesota expresses its position on the LPNH matter and affiliate autonomy. 

 

Please take a moment to consider the statement of the Minnesota Party on current LNC controversies.

 

Thanks for your prompt attention to this important matter. 

 

Austin Martin

R1

 

Ua mau ke ea o ka ʻāina i ka pono

 

You're receiving this message because you're a member of the Judicial group from Libertarian National Committee. To take part in this conversation, reply all to this message.

View group files   |   Leave group   |   Learn more about Microsoft 365 Groups

[lnc-public_forward]

 

---

From: Alfa Shaw <alfa...@lp.org>
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2026 10:33:43 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; ken.moellman <ken.mo...@lpstates.com>

Cc: LNC Public <lnc-p...@lp.org>; lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>; Judicial <judi...@lp.org>; rebecca.whiting <rebecca...@lpmn.org>
Subject: Re: Minnesota weighs in on LPNH with a Resolution

Greetings. 

LPMN's resolution has been added to the Lpedia page matching its topic.

It will also be added to the LPMN page under Resolutions in the coming days.

It resides there along with the other 7 related resolutions passed by various state affiliates in the last month.

For anyone interested, the page is located at:

https://lpedia.org/wiki/New_Hampshire_Disaffiliation_2026

Thank you.

In Liberty, 

Alfa Shaw

Region 6

"Relationships begin with Understanding"

---

From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Sunday, 12 July 2026 00:28:28