Respect cuts both ways.
I am constantly assaulted by improper attempts and calls to violate my member rights and the rights of my states.
Then my reaction is framed as the problem.
Words like "Nazi" have real and politically useful meaning, especially when describing unreasonable draconians.
Can anyone describe the difference between calling someone a "Nazi" and calling someone a "nigger"?
Calling someone a "Nazi" is characterizing someone's choices and behavior — generally describing tyranny, aggressive manipulation, unfair prejudice, abuses of authority, repression, control, or other draconian acts. Therefore the word "Nazi" represents a critical
opinion which is to be protected, regardless of whether it causes offense in the person or action being described.
The other word, "nigger" is an offensive pejorative slur against an immutable personal characteristic, namely, disparagement toward race or skin color, and cannot in any way be characterized as a substantive critique of choices, actions, or character.
Only one of the two above examples would actually create an actionable policy violation. I would condemn someone using abusive racial slurs against a colleague — but calling them a "Nazi" or a "socialist" or a "nihilist" or even words like "prick" are perfectly
acceptable polemical descriptive terms aimed at unfair actions.
Ironically, the State of Hawaii also tried to prosecute me for using the word "Nazi" to describe the enforcers covid mandates. They behaved the same way as the Nazi-LNC is behaving today in nearly every way.
They too characterized it as "disorderly conduct" and "violating the governor's emergency powers".
So I ask — in what way are you not behaving like "Nazis" right now?
Mahalo!