FW: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
152 views
Skip to first unread message
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:15:35 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:15:25 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
We have an LNC email ballot. Votes are due to the LNC List on this email thread by 11:59 pm Pacific Time on January 27th, 2026.
Motion:
Move to create an ad-hoc Supplemental Messaging Committee populated with the following members:
- Chase Oliver
- Kyle Davis
- Rob Yates
- Casey Crowe
- Amanda Griffiths
They shall be empowered to, alongside the social media committee, post statements across our social media accounts, as well as submitting articles and communications to the APRC.
These communications shall be primarily focused on the topics of ICE, Immigration reform, and governmental abuses.
Their statements must be in-line with the platform of the Party and our Statement of Principles, and their statements shall be subject to APRC review.
Co-Sponsors: Thompson - Redpath, Knebel, Darr
Vote Threshold Required: Majority
Secretary’s Notes: None
Vote Tracker: https://tinyurl.com/LNC20260120-03
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:19:43 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:19:31 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I vote yes.
Keith Thompson
Region 3 South Rep
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:15 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:15 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:22:59 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:22:47 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I move to amend this to replace the language "They
shall be empowered to, alongside the social media committee, post statements across our social media accounts, as well as submitting articles and communications to the APRC" with "Thall be a working group that offers the communications director suggestions
for social media posts." This committee is unnecessary and can potentially be disruptive.
From: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:19:31 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:19:31 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:33:23 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Travis Bost <travi...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:33:08 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
No
(I did not realize they would be empowered to post on our platforms)
Travis L. Bost
LNC At-Large
Travi...@LP.org
From: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:22:47 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:22:47 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:34:26 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:34:16 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Mr. Watkins,
I believe your "motion to amend" would be a substatution and not an amendment as it seeks to change the intent of the main motion, ie create an empowered committee.
From: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:22 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:22 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:47:17 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Travis Bost <travi...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:47:05 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I will co-sponsor the amendment or substitution.
Not having group input on the names is one thing; sidestepping communications is yet another.
Travis L. Bost
LNC At-Large
Travi...@LP.org
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:34:16 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 3:34:16 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:47:31 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:47:16 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Then I move it as a substitute motion.
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:34:16 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:34:16 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 4:51:17 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 9:51:07 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I would ask the Chair to rule on if a motion to amend (in any form) an email ballot main motion already in process of being voted on can be taken up and if so does it require co-sponsors to move said amendment?
From: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:47 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:47 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 5:05:13 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 10:05:05 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Just a note: it doesn't have 5 cosponsors.
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 11:51:07 AM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 11:51:07 AM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 20, 2026, 5:07:42 PMJan 20
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 10:07:32 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
You are correct: the main motion has four cosponsors. The astute reader may note that
four is more than the required three.
Keith Thompson
Region 3 South Rep
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:05 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:05 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 21, 2026, 10:17:03 PMJan 21
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Ben Weir <ben....@lp.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 3:16:57 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
lnc-public_forward
Jan 22, 2026, 12:39:00 PMJan 22
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Steven Nekhaila <steven....@lp.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2026 5:38:30 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Ben Weir <ben....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Dear All,
A question was raised as to whether an amendment, or even a motion to substitute, can be made while an email ballot is actively in progress.
RONR does not give us guidelines on electronic balloting. RONR treats out-of-meeting voting as an exception that only exists when an organization's governing rules expressly authorize it. As such, the controlling authority here is the LNC Policy Manual.
The Policy Manual structures email ballots as follows: it is vote-first and vote-only, except where the manual explicitly allows otherwise (a defined process to allow debate, and the defined objection-to-consideration window). What the manual is silent on is
any mechanism to run amendments/substitutes inside an active ballot. There is no procedural recognition process, no order of competing proposals, etc. There is no functional mechanism provided for processing amendments.
As a practical matter, email ballots are structured such that the LNC is effectively required to act as a quasi–committee of the whole during the “workshopping” phase prior to co-sponsorship, and then move directly into balloting.
RONR provides that when a vote is being taken, it is not to be interrupted once members have begun voting. Once the ballot has been started and votes are being cast, the body’s task is to complete that vote under the authorized process.
Accordingly, once a ballot is in progress, it must continue until completed as outlined by the Policy Manual.
I rule that once an electronic mail ballot has been initiated, amendments and substitute motions to that question are not in order within that active ballot. During the ballot, members may (a) debate as outlined in the PM, (b) vote/abstain, (c) change their
vote as permitted, and (d) object to consideration within the time window specified in the Policy Manual. Any revised language must be offered as a new motion for a subsequent ballot after the current ballot closes.
Sincerely,
Steven Nekhaila
Chairman, LNC
Sincerely,
Steven Nekhaila
Chairman, LNC
From: Ben Weir <ben....@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:16 PM
Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2026 10:16 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 23, 2026, 12:50:43 PMJan 23
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Bill Redpath <bill.r...@lp.org>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 5:50:23 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Ben Weir <ben....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I vote Yes. Bill Redpath
lnc-public_forward
Jan 27, 2026, 6:38:23 PM (14 days ago) Jan 27
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Otto Dassing <otto.d...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 11:38:15 PM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Bill Redpath <bill.r...@lp.org>; Ben Weir <ben....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
No
From: Bill Redpath <bill.r...@lp.org>
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 12:50:23 PM
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2026 12:50:23 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 27, 2026, 9:36:59 PM (14 days ago) Jan 27
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Andrew Watkins <andrew....@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 2:36:46 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Otto Dassing <otto.d...@lp.org>; Bill Redpath <bill.r...@lp.org>; Ben Weir <ben....@lp.org>; Keith Thompson <keith.t...@lp.org>; Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
No
From: Otto Dassing <otto.d...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:38:15 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:38:15 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 27, 2026, 9:48:42 PM (14 days ago) Jan 27
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 2:48:29 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I vote no.
Best,
|
|
lnc-public_forward
Jan 27, 2026, 10:26:54 PM (14 days ago) Jan 27
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Meredith Hays <meredi...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 3:26:43 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Voting NO, this committee is redundant. The APRC should do this and can receive input as necessary.
From: Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:48:29 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:48:29 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 27, 2026, 11:43:38 PM (14 days ago) Jan 27
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Andrew Chadderdon <andrew.c...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 4:43:25 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Meredith Hays <meredi...@lp.org>; Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
I vote no
Andrew Chadderdon
Region 1 Rep | Libertarian National Committee
From: Meredith Hays <meredi...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 10:26:43 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 10:26:43 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 27, 2026, 11:47:57 PM (14 days ago) Jan 27
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 4:47:46 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Meredith Hays <meredi...@lp.org>; Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Dear Chair and LNC Members,
I raise a Point of Order that the current email ballot to create an ad-hoc Supplemental Messaging Committee focused on ICE, immigration reform, and governmental abuses — with proposed members including Kyle Davis and Amanda Griffiths — is out of order and the ballot should be terminated immediately. [1]
The Chair is requested to rule the motion out of order for the following reasons:
-
The motion proposes to grant direct posting authority on official Libertarian Party social media accounts to individuals who have publicly expressed or associated with positions inconsistent with the Party's foundational Non-Aggression Principle (as affirmed in the Statement of Principles and the membership pledge required by Bylaws Article 4, Section 1).
-
Content published on The Torch (edited by proposed member Amanda Griffiths) explicitly states that "The Non-Aggression Principle is woefully outdated at best" and calls for it to be replaced.[2]
-
Proposed member Kyle Davis has posted statements on X appearing to justify armed resistance against government agents enforcing laws (e.g., “shoot back”, "If you're my neighbor and someone kicks your door in to take you from your home... I'm stopping them. If that means with my guns, then it means with my guns"). [3]
-
Such positions conflict with the membership pledge, which requires certification that one does "not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals," and with the Party's Statement of Principles.
-
The motion explicitly requires that committee statements "must be in-line with the platform of the Party and our Statement of Principles." Appointing individuals who have publicly opposed or undermined these core tenets creates an inherent conflict and substantial risk that the committee will produce messaging inconsistent with those requirements, rendering the motion self-contradictory and improper.
-
The motion grants committee members direct posting authority on official Party social media accounts, in violation of the LNC Policy Manual's Social Media Policy, which places management of official social media under the Communications Department and requires staff oversight/approval for posts. [4] This bypasses the established controls and authority of the Communications Director.
-
Granting official messaging authority to individuals with documented public positions conflicting with the Party's core principles risks significant reputational harm to the Libertarian Party, as official posts would carry the Party's imprimatur while potentially reflecting views at odds with our foundational commitment to non-aggression.
The proposed motion therefore violates the Bylaws, the spirit of the Party's Statement of Principles, and adopted LNC policy, and should not be considered.
If the Chair rules this Point of Order not well taken, I give notice of intent to appeal the ruling to the Judicial Committee.
References:
[1] Motion text and ballot discussion: As posted to the public LNC email list (accessible to members via archives).
[2] The Torch article calling the NAP outdated and in need of replacement: https://thetorch.media/the-nap-is-woefully-outdated-libertarianism-needs-a-replacement (Published November 29, 2025; Amanda Griffiths is listed as editor of The Torch).
[3] Kyle Davis (@OrcinusWasHere) X posts justifying armed resistance (examples):
-
Direct call for citizens to "shoot back" at ICE agents (October 7, 2025): "Every time they visit violence upon people, like the woman they just shot for no reason, the citizens should be shooting back to defend themselves. ... ACAB." Link: https://x.com/OrcinusWasHere/status/1975443062135341557
-
Advocacy for showing up "armed to the teeth" to confront/stop ICE, using force if they "get out of line" (October 5, 2025): "I'm saying we show up armed to the teeth anywhere ICE is showing up and the MOMENT they get out of line, we stop them. WHEN they become violent (because they will), we used the force required to stop them." Link: https://x.com/OrcinusWasHere/status/1974888950214132031
-
Statement that "fighting" ICE agents is "pro-America" (October 4, 2025, quoting a DHS official's post about an armed confrontation): "ICE is unconstitutional. Fighting armed thugs who are kidnapping peaceful people is pro-America." Link: https://x.com/OrcinusWasHere/status/1974559955668877503
These were mostly phrased in contexts of response to perceived government initiation of force, but they explicitly reference using lethal or confrontational force against agents. I do not raise this issue from personal animus, but for concern for our organization.
[4] LNC Policy Manual (current as of April 2025 amendments), Social Media Policy section (referencing policy adopted July 3, 2022, centralizing official social media management): https://lp.org/wp-content/uploads/LNC-Policy-Manual-Adopted-thru-2025-04-06-1.pdf
Respectfully,
Austin Martin — R1
Libertarian Party of Hawaii
lnc-public_forward
Jan 28, 2026, 12:13:04 AM (14 days ago) Jan 28
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 5:12:50 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Meredith Hays <meredi...@lp.org>; Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
And in case it wasn't clear from my prior email, if the chair rules against my point of order, I vote No.
Austin Martin — R1
Libertarian Party of Hawaii
Join the fight and support the removal of Socialism from the LP by donating at the link below:
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:47:46 PM
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2026 6:47:46 PM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 28, 2026, 12:32:25 AM (14 days ago) Jan 28
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Pat Ford <pat....@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 5:32:15 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>; Meredith Hays <meredi...@lp.org>; Robert Vinson <robert...@lp.org>; Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Regards
Pat Ford
Libertarian National Committee
Chair Convention Oversight Commitee
617.835.1899
Pat....@LP.org
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP-Leonard Nimoy
Pat Ford
Libertarian National Committee
Chair Convention Oversight Commitee
617.835.1899
Pat....@LP.org
A life is like a garden. Perfect moments can be had, but not preserved, except in memory. LLAP-Leonard Nimoy
From: Austin Martin <austin...@lp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 12:12 AM
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2026 12:12 AM
lnc-public_forward
Jan 29, 2026, 7:28:13 PM (12 days ago) Jan 29
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 12:28:04 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Mr. Chair,
Below are the results for Email Ballot 20260120-03 "create an ad-hoc Supplemental Messaging Committee":
2-8-0
Yes: 2 (Redpath, Thompson)
No: 8 (Bost, Chadderdon, Dassing, Ford, Hays, Martin, Vinson, Watkins)
Abstain: 0
Threshold: Majority
Vote Tracker:
https://tinyurl.com/LNC20260120-03
Secretary Note: Mr. Weir's vote was superseded by Mr. Ford's vote.
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:15 PM
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2026 4:15 PM
To: Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
lnc-public_forward
Jan 29, 2026, 7:52:55 PM (12 days ago) Jan 29
to lnc-p...@googlegroups.com
From: Steven Nekhaila <steven....@lp.org>
Sent: Friday, January 30, 2026 12:52:49 AM (UTC+00:00) Monrovia, Reykjavik
To: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>; Entire LNC <entir...@lp.org>
Cc: lnc-public_forward <lnc-publi...@lp.org>
Subject: Re: EMAIL BALLOT 20260120-03 Supplemental Messaging
Motion fails.
Sincerely,
Steven Nekhaila
Sincerely,
Steven Nekhaila
Chairman, LNC
From: Evan McMahon <evan.m...@lp.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 7:28 PM
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2026 7:28 PM
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages