Hi Paul,
Hannah suggested I contact you with regard to a concern I have about tracking national memberships.
I recently learned that the only way that the National LP determines a member's state affiliation is by their mailing address but this is not sufficient in all cases. Some states allow members who reside in other states to become a member in that state. Most
do not require that the member ONLY be a member of that state. Thus someone could be a member of more than one state, Since National only attributes membership based on mailing address there is currently no way that a member can indicate that they want their
national membership to be attributed to a state other than the one they reside in.
There are several reasons that someone might want to be affiliated with a different state and I see nothing in the bylaws that requires that a national member only be affiliated with the state they live in. This problem is most likely to arise with life
members who might have to leave the state in which they lived when they became a life member but still feel connected to that state rather than the one they have moved to. This could occur if some has to move, temporarily or permanently, to another state for
work or because they have to care for a family member. It's also possible that someone simply might not wish to be associated with the state they live in. I can think of several states where if I had to move there I would not wish to be considered a member
of that state.
I realize that the current system is an easy way to ensure that a member will only be counted as a member of one state. It is not an unreasonable default assumption to assume someone wants to be a member of the state where they live, but I think there
needs to be a way for a member to specify that their membership be changed to a different state by requesting such a change in writing to the national secretary.
As I said, I currently see no bylaw requirement that a person only be affiliated with their state of residence so I'm not sure if this is a bylaw issue or not. Since the bylaws don't forbid it perhaps this only needs to be a procedural issue. It seems
safer though, to have the bylaws explicitly authorize it, designate who is responsible for tracking it and make it clear that a person can only be a member of one state for the purpose of national affiliation. It might also require a new field in the national
database to track affiliation to ensure that members only count toward their state of choice for delegate allocation rather than their state of residence.
So what do you suggest I do to find a resolution for this situation?
June Genis, life member of CA and National