Executive session may only be used in four instances:
-
Personnel matters - Caryn Ann is not a staff member.
-
Contractual negotiations - that is not applicable to this situation.
-
Litigation - this is the closest item I can see, but as none of the charges deal with Caryn Ann's lawsuit, so this is not germane to the trial.
-
Political strategy requiring confidentiality - this is also not applicable.
I can see a situation where we use executive session as a courtesy for the accused, especially since she was opposed to releasing the full IC report. However, given that Caryn Ann and her attorney have both expressed they wish to conduct the trial in open session,
this also does not apply.
There has been an alarming trend of secrecy as of late and this is no exception. I don't want to endure a longer than necessary meeting either, but that's no reason to quash public comment and force this into a secret session where members will be left to wonder
what took place.
If there are particular things that need to be discussed in executive session, it may be best to dip in and out as needed so only those items are held in secret.
It would be best for the organization to openly conduct as much as possible, which includes allowing for public comment and a waiting room as we talk about any particular items that require executive session.
In Liberty,
Keith Thompson
Region 3 Alternate
Forwarding to entire list.
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann
My attorney has the right to make motions relating to the conduct of the trial (due process, remember?) and one of those will be for the trial to be in open session. That is not the only motion. All those motions are permitted and
MUST be held in open session.
In Liberty,
Caryn Ann