Hi,
I am trying to see the difference between different inlining options that
llvm supports (https://clang.llvm.org/docs/analyzer/developer-docs/IPA.html).
The way I invoked them was -
clang++ -Xclang -analyzer-config -Xclang -ipa=dynamic -std=c++11 -Wall
something.cc -o something (for dynamic mode)
clang++ -Xclang -analyzer-config -Xclang -ipa=basic -std=c++11 -Wall
something.cc -o something (for basic mode)
and so on.
However, I did't observe much difference in execution times for the runs
with different inlining modes, which is making me wonder if I did this
correctly? Is this the right way to use the different inlining modes? Can
anyone tell me if I am missing something?
Thanks,
Bodhi
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm...@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Let me re-iterate my question. Is there any way we can test out the inlining
modes mentioned in clang documentation
(https://clang.llvm.org/docs/analyzer/developer-docs/IPA.htm) -
basic-inlining, dynamic, dynamic-bifurcate, etc? The instructions in the docs
seem to be talking about clang in general, not the static analyzer.
Also, I'd appreciate if you point to an example usage of different inlining
options with opt? I am only aware of the -always-inline flag that can be
loaded with opt.