[LLVMdev] regression in llvm 3.4 branch

16 views
Skip to first unread message

Jack Howarth

unread,
Nov 21, 2013, 11:27:49 AM11/21/13
to llv...@cs.uiuc.edu
On x86_64-apple-darwin12, I am seeing regressions in the current
llvm 3.4 release branch during 'make check'...

Scanning dependencies of target check-llvm
[100%] Running the LLVM regression tests
FAIL: LLVM :: CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll (1362 of 9265)
******************** TEST 'LLVM :: CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4-0/llvm-3.4/build/bin/./llc -debug < /sw/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4-0/llvm-3.4/test/CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll -o /dev/null 2>&1 | /sw/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4-0/llvm-3.4/build/bin/./FileCheck /sw/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4-0/llvm-3.4/test/CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll
--
Exit Code: 1

Command Output (stderr):
--
/sw/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4-0/llvm-3.4/test/CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll:24:10: error: expected string not found in input
; CHECK: Changing optimization level for Function fooWithOptnone
^
<stdin>:1:1: note: scanning from here
llc: Unknown command line argument '-debug'. Try: '/sw/src/fink.build/llvm34-3.4-0/llvm-3.4/build/bin/./llc -help'
^
<stdin>:2:1: note: possible intended match here
llc: Did you mean '-mcpu'?
^

--

********************
Testing Time: 42.02s
********************
Failing Tests (1):
LLVM :: CodeGen/Generic/isel-optnone.ll

Expected Passes : 5978
Expected Failures : 26
Unsupported Tests : 3260
Unexpected Failures: 1
make[3]: *** [test/CMakeFiles/check-llvm] Error 1
make[2]: *** [test/CMakeFiles/check-llvm.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** [test/CMakeFiles/check.dir/rule] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2

_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
LLV...@cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

Sean Silva

unread,
Nov 21, 2013, 11:35:04 AM11/21/13
to Jack Howarth, Robinson, Paul, llv...@cs.uiuc.edu
Paul, could you take a look at this? Maybe it would make more sense for the in-progress optnone work to be omitted from the release?

-- Sean Silva

NAKAMURA Takumi

unread,
Nov 21, 2013, 11:38:55 AM11/21/13
to Sean Silva, llv...@cs.uiuc.edu
I reverted it in trunk, FYI.

2013/11/22 Sean Silva <sil...@purdue.edu>:
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages