[llvm-dev] Job openings to work on LLVM, Clang, and LLDB at Apple

191 views
Skip to first unread message

Alex Rosenberg via llvm-dev

unread,
Mar 13, 2017, 4:39:02 PM3/13/17
to llvm-dev
Apple’s Developer Tools team is seeking exceptional engineers to work on LLVM, Clang, and LLDB. Positions are open at a variety of levels of experience. Select positions are highlighted below. Please send all responses to llvm-jo...@group.apple.com, including the relevant job title and a CV.

Chad Rosier via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 25, 2017, 4:14:13 PM8/25/17
to llvm...@lists.llvm.org
All,
The Data Center Group is seeking exceptional engineers to work on
optimizing just-in-time (JIT) compilers for virtual machines for our
server based platforms.  The responsibilities of this position include
analyzing workloads to determine bottlenecks, utilize strong knowledge
of our micro-architecture to improve performance and work with the open
source communities to drive target specific changes into JIT compilers. 
The ideal candidate will love to squeeze every bit of performance out of
a system and enjoy working with open source communities.

For full details please see:
https://jobs.qualcomm.com/public/jobDetails.xhtml?requisitionId=1958086

Please apply @ jobs.qualcomm.com (i.e., I will not be accepting resumes
directly).

 Regards,
  Chad


_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm...@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev

John Criswell via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 26, 2017, 10:15:41 AM8/26/17
to Chad Rosier, llvm...@lists.llvm.org
Dear Chad,

Is this position related to LLVM or an LLVM-based project?

Job ads for jobs using or working with LLVM are fine, but they should
explicitly state the connection to LLVM. The description below makes no
mention of LLVM.

Regards,

John Criswell


--
John Criswell
Assistant Professor
Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester
http://www.cs.rochester.edu/u/criswell

Chad Rosier via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 26, 2017, 12:39:37 PM8/26/17
to John Criswell, llvm...@lists.llvm.org
Hi John,
I was posting the position on behalf of another team within my group,
DCG.  The scope of the work is fairly broad and is closely related to
the type of work we do with LLVM, but I don't believe the potential
candidate will work directly on LLVM (at least that's not the immediate
plan).  I apologize if I've somehow misused the mailing list; that was
certainly not my intent.  I'll be more careful going forward.

 Chad

Chris Lattner via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 29, 2017, 1:19:08 AM8/29/17
to Chad Rosier, llvm...@lists.llvm.org
HI Chad,

As John points out, job postings to this list are okay if and only if they are somehow related to LLVM. We understand that mistakes happen, but please keep in mind for the future. Thanks!

-Chris

via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 29, 2017, 2:34:19 PM8/29/17
to Chris Lattner, llvm...@lists.llvm.org
Will do, Chris! Again, my apologizes.

Alex Denisov via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 30, 2017, 5:03:26 AM8/30/17
to Chris Lattner, llvm-dev
Just out of curiosity: where the requirement comes from?
signature.asc

John Criswell via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 30, 2017, 8:53:26 AM8/30/17
to Alex Denisov, Chris Lattner, llvm-dev
On 8/30/17 5:03 AM, Alex Denisov via llvm-dev wrote:
Just out of curiosity: where the requirement comes from?

If I remember correctly, Chris Lattner added the rule back when we first made llvmdev a public mailing list (I helped moderate the list).  The goal, as I recall, was to keep messages on llvmdev on-topic.  If we allowed non-LLVM related job posts, we'd probably get swamped with job ads.

As far as I can tell, the community has supported this rule; I haven't seen any complaints against it.

Regards,

John Criswell

Chris Lattner via llvm-dev

unread,
Aug 31, 2017, 1:03:45 AM8/31/17
to Alex Denisov, llvm-dev

> On Aug 30, 2017, at 2:03 AM, Alex Denisov <1101....@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just out of curiosity: where the requirement comes from?

llvm-dev is a mailing list about LLVM. It is not a general compiler engineer forum. Postings that are not related to LLVM are off topic.

This isn’t a new rule, it has been long standing and is just common sense.

-Chris

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages