I don't see the problem, to be honest. I understand that if an
event has low turn out it's possible that people might not be so
interested in the next one, but I don't think that that, per se,
was ever so much the problem in sem 1 as short notice before
events, and as you rightly point out, not a very solid plan.
Because I can honestly say, the events I did go to in sem 1,
everyone did seem to enjoy themselves, and I definitely did. Re
scrabble, Amy, who came last sem to scrabble, has already said
she'd be keen to come, as has another friend who I did
Linguistics with last sem.
If you really think we should cance like scrabble, I can do that,
but I really don't think it's necessary given we have 12 days to
get the word out to people (the "social" on Tues was very last
minute).
You are happy to be in charge of advertizing for us, right?
Obviously we all do our bit for that though.
And we can decide on another event before the scrabble, and
potentially have a committee meeting as well next week if you
guys are keen? Do you think a talk with going out to dinner
afterwards is a good idea? Rouan would you be interested in
talking about your research as we mentioned on Tuesday? And do
you guys think Tuesday 24 Sept is a good date to aim for for
that?
To: Aine Kelly-Costello <
ain...@gmail.com
Date sent: Thu, 15 Aug 2013 19:05:33 +1200
Subject: Re: Events
I thought what Rouan meant was having a meeting, not scrabble.
Either way I
do not think it is a good idea to have it now. We can get people
to come,
but if there is nothing to follow, we are going to lose them. We
need to be
able to tell them the next event.
Every time we fail an event, we lose people. They will not come
back and we
are having difficulties to get people to come. Those people who
attend are
those who do not return (obviously). So we need to make them come
back, not
lose them.