I don't know, Joseph, I found this article pretty uninsightful, not to
mention deluded . . . what I found truly saddening was the readers'
comments. Certainly, the attitudes and shallowness expressed by these
people are nothing new to me, but still, reading and hearing comments
from people like this always seems to depress me.
One of the people commenting actually tries to claim that people who
are under 30 don't read. Is he serious? Again, this belief is nothing
new to me, but that doesn't make it any less baffling and depressing
when I hear or read it being expressed.
At any rate, too many of these people are clearly quite confused about
what they think literary art is supposed to be and especially what
they, personally, actually want out of literature.
Although the Huffington Post is perhaps not quite scraping the very
bottom off the barrel, just yet, among readers of literature, they
seem to be uncomfortably close to it.
As for the magazines themselves -- those which are listed in the
article: sorry, Joseph, I do not happen to find any of them very
interesting -- except, perhaps, for the Iowa Review, in which I
believe I recall having seen some good and interesting material, in
the past, but again this is not really a journal I'd be interested in
reviewing.
On Aug 15, 10:18 am, Joseph Johaneman <
jejohane...@me.com> wrote:
> This was on HuffPo yesterday. Figured we might find some of these lit mags interesting to review. Some of them are obviously no surprise.
>
>
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anis-shivani/anis-shivani17-literary-j_...
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> Contributing Editor at Apple Thoughts
> ----
> Joe Johaneman
>
jejohane...@me.com
> My Home Page