Waiora funded comparison of ZNatural vs. NCD

[William Croft]

The Waiora funded “independent lab tests” of NCD vs. ZNatural (
http://www.liquidzeolite.org/brands.html ) show that ZNatural contains
“no detectable conventional zeolite”. But:

“Harvey Kaufman from Lifelink, the manufacturer of ZNatural, has
stated that in his manufacturing processes the clinoptilolite is
broken down further into sub-components ( ”nano-zeolite” ) that are
novel molecules and not zeolite at all. This could be why there is no
detectable zeolite in their products.”

In support of what Kaufman is saying about nano zeolites, you may want
to add this company to your list:

ACZ Nano
http://www.resultsrna.com/products/acz_nano_overview.html

There are several online retailers selling the 2 oz bottles for about
$40. See google link below. But the Results RNA main website wholesale
online ordering is for “licensed health practitioners only”.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22acz+nano%22

I would be interested in any opinions of the ACZ. On the page below,
Results RNA (manufacturer) claims that 1 bottle of ACZ is equivalent
to TEN bottles of NCD in terms of surface area of the nano particles.

http://www.resultsrna.com/products/understanding_nano_tech.html

I’ve used both NCD and ZNatural (from Trilogy) and my energetic
testing and sense of chi flow is showing the ZNatural is more potent
than the NCD. Havent tried the ACZ yet, but my dowsing is saying that
both are using the nano zeolite idea and are similar in action.

William Croft
Lightfield Systems

PS check out my recommendations for Energize and Detox strategies at
www.lightfield.com/energize.htm .