Arcadia System

[Willy Aucoin]

Integrationof both wired and wireless partyline systems. The 1RU device provides 2-wire, 4-wire, SFP and GPIO connections allowing both analog and digital intercom capability including the full range of FreeSpeak products (E1/IP TCVRs; 1.9, 2.4 and 5 GHz beltpacks), HelixNet Wired Intercom (HelixNet Remote Station, Speaker Station, and Beltpack), I.V. Direct and Dante Audio Network Interfaces.

In many college or business campuses, communications for productions are necessary, but having a single system that can reach all the locales can be a difficult task. Moving flypacks from place to place can be difficult and many times your have more productions than flypacks. The latest firmware release for the Arcadia Central Station allows for higher device capacities and the ability to connect to other stations or frames via and I.V. Direct connection. This gives a large campus significant flexibility to scale communications to virtually any size.

In the development cycle of a system, former practices focused more on the definition of requirements, their allocation to each component of the system component and associated traceability. Current approaches rather focus on functional analysis, system design, justification of architectural choices, and verification steps. In addition, the design takes into account not only the functional point of view, but also other points of view, which affect the definition and breakdown of the system. For example, constraints relating to system integration, product line management, safety, performance and feasibility. Systems engineering is therefore not just about managing the system requirements, but is a complex design activity.

The vision for ARCADIA was to break the "walls" between different engineering specializations including architects, development teams, Specialists, IVVQ (Integration, Verification, Validation, and Qualification) Teams, Customer and external partners.

The ARCADIA method applies to the design of complex and critical systems, and more generally architectures that are subject to multiple functional and non-functional constraints, including software, electronic, electrical architectures, and industrial processes. It defines a set of practices that guides needs analysis and design to meet an operational requirement. At the same time it is adaptable to the processes and constraints linked to various types of life cycles such as bottom-up approach, application reuse, incremental, iterative and partial development.

ARCADIA is a structured engineering method to identify and check the architecture of complex systems. It promotes collaborative work among all stakeholders during many of the engineering phases of the system. It allows iterations during the definition phase that help the architects to converge towards satisfaction of all identified needs.

The ARCADIA method is tooled through Capella, a modeling tool that meets full-scale deployment constraints in an operational context. Capella is available free of charge from the engineering community under open source.

One of the difficulties frequently encountered in the development of complex systems comes from the superposition of several partially independent functional chains using shared resources (including but not limited to computing resources). The ARCADIA method and the underlying tools are used to identify functional chains, their overlapping scenarios and desired performance, along with their support by the architecture. Starting with the first level of system analysis, they ensure traceability throughout the process definition and check each proposed architectural design against expected performance and constraints.

The non-functional properties expected from the system solution are also formalized in 'viewpoints'. Each viewpoint captures constraints that the system should face or meet (feared events, security threats, latency expectations, product line or reuse constraints, power consumption or cost issues, and more). Then the architecture model is automatically analyzed to verify that it meets these constraints, thanks to dedicated expert rules (performance computation, resource consumption, safety or security barriers, etc.). This analysis can be done very early in the development cycle, detecting design issues as soon as possible ("early validation").

As a summary, the approach to characterization by views (or "viewpoints") cross-checks that the proposed architecture is capable of providing the required functions with the desired level of performance, security, dependability, mass, scalability, environments, mass, interfaces, etc. ensuring the consistency of engineering decisions, because all engineering stakeholders share the same engineering information, and can apply his/her own views and checks to them, so as to secure the common definition.

The second step focuses now on the system/SW itself, in order to define how it can satisfy the former operational need, along with its expected behaviour and qualities: system/SW functions to be supported and related exchanges, non functional constraints (safety, security...), performances allocated to system boundary, role sharing and interactions between system and operators. It also checks for feasibility (including cost, schedule and technology readiness) of customer requirements, and if necessary gives means to renegotiate their contents. To do this, a first early system/SW architecture (architectural design model) is sketched, from system/SW functional need; then requirements are examined against this architecture in order to evaluate their cost and consistency.Outputs of this step mainly consist of system/SW functional Need description, interoperability and interaction with the users and external systems (functions, exchanges plus non-functional constraints), and system/SW requirements.

The third step intends to identify the system/SW parts (hereafter called components), their contents, relationships and properties, excluding implementation or technical/technological issues. This constitutes the system/SW logical architecture.In order for this breakdown in components to be stable in further steps, all major [non-functional] constraints (safety, security, performance, IVV, Cost, non technical, etc.) are taken into account and compared to each other's so as to find the best compromise between them. This method is described as "Viewpoints-driven", viewpoints being the formalization of the way these constraints impact the system/SW architecture. Outputs of this step consist of the selected logical architecture: components and interfaces definition, including formalization of all viewpoints and the way they are taken into account in the components design. Since the architecture has to be validated against Need, links with requirements and operational scenarios are also produced.

The fourth step has the same intents as logical architecture building, except that it defines the "final" architecture of the system/SW at this level of engineering, ready to develop (by lower engineering levels). Therefore, it introduces rationalization, architectural patterns, new technical services and components, and makes the logical architecture evolve according to implementation, technical and technological constraints and choices (at this level of engineering). Note that the same "Viewpoints-driven" method as for logical architecture building is used for physical architecture definition. Outputs of this step consist of the selected physical architecture: components to be produced, including formalization of all viewpoints and the way they are taken into account in the components design. Links with requirements and operational scenarios are also produced.

The fifth and last step is a contribution to EPBS (End-Product Breakdown Structure) building, taking benefits from the former architectural work, to enforce components requirements definition, and prepare a secured IVVQ.All choices associated to the system/SW chosen architecture, and all hypothesis and constraints imposed to components and architecture to fit need and constraints, are summarized and checked here.Outputs from this step are mainly "component Integration contract" collected all necessary expected properties for each component to be developed.

The following figure shows a global view summarizing the recommended technical process, featuring the three elements of the engineering triptych, and their production activities all along the definition and design process.

The most powerful arcade platform released to date features no revenue share, no required internet services and 4 cartridge slots to optimize income in a single cabinet. You can easily upgrade to new a game by simply swapping or adding a cartridge to your system. Compatible with 100-240v.

Modern systems are subject to increasingly higherconstraints regarding expected behavior and services, safety, security, performance, environment,human factors, etc. All these constraints are under theresponsibility of different stakeholders, which need to be reconciled during the solutionarchitectural design and development process.

Arcadia is a model-based engineering method for systems,hardware and software architectural design. It has been developedby Thales between 2005 and 2010 through an iterative processinvolving operational architects from all the Thales businessdomains. Since 2018, Arcadia is registered as Z67-140 standard by AFNOR, the French national organization for standardization.

The first perspective focuses on analyzing the customer needs and goals,expected missions and activities, far beyond system requirements.This analysis aims at ensuring adequate system definitionwith regard to its real operational use and IVVQ conditions.

The second perspective focuses on the system itself, in order todefine how it can satisfy the former operational need, alongwith its expected behavior and qualities. The following elementsare created during this step: Functions (or services) to be supported and relatedexchanges, non-functional constraints (safety, security, etc.);performance allocated to system boundary; role sharing andinteractions between system and operators; scenarios of usage, etc.

3a8082e126