On my machine, anything above divisor 2200 seems to stop all traffic. If I want to be fair between hosts (but not flows) for a large network (say 6000 hosts), I run into problems. Obviously the rates here are quite low but this is just an example.
I also tested on a real interface with the same results.
Example that works:
tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 3: htb default 10
tc class add dev ifb0 parent 3: classid 3:1 htb rate 80kbit
tc class add dev ifb0 parent 3:1 classid 3:10 htb rate 80kbit
tc qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 3:10 handle 310: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev ifb0 parent 3: protocol all prio 1 u32 match mark 0x000 0xf00 flowid 3:10
tc filter add dev ifb0 parent 310: protocol all handle 0x310 flow hash keys dst divisor 1024
Example that doesn't work:
tc qdisc add dev ifb0 root handle 3: htb default 10
tc class add dev ifb0 parent 3: classid 3:1 htb rate 80kbit
tc class add dev ifb0 parent 3:1 classid 3:10 htb rate 80kbit
tc qdisc add dev ifb0 parent 3:10 handle 310: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev ifb0 parent 3: protocol all prio 1 u32 match mark 0x000 0xf00 flowid 3:10
tc filter add dev ifb0 parent 310: protocol all handle 0x310 flow hash keys dst divisor 6144
Jonathan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
SFQ is limited to a 1024 divisor
You might try following patch :
(8192 is the smallest power of two greater than 6144)
sizeof(struct sfq_sched_data) becomes 0x2ccc instead of 0x10cc
keep in mind hash distribution is not perfect.
What would be the real rate ?
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
index 3cf478d..c4a53d6 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_sfq.c
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
It is easy to increase these values, but not in flight. */
#define SFQ_DEPTH 128
-#define SFQ_HASH_DIVISOR 1024
+#define SFQ_HASH_DIVISOR 8192
/* This type should contain at least SFQ_DEPTH*2 values */
typedef unsigned char sfq_index;
Because of low SFQ_DEPTH, which limits its queue to 127 packets,
SFQ isn't suitable for serving so many users. There is sch_drr as
a replacement, alas more complex and undocumented, but google should
help you enough.
Jarek P.
Sorry! Actually there is a man page already!
Kudos to Florian!
It at least shows I wasn't just confused about the way it works. In its planned final form, the rate will be set around 175Mbit. I don't need perfect distribution so things should be fine as long as hosts cannot easily cheat their way into having more bandwidth merely by creating more flows.
Jonathan
Jonathan
On 15/10/10 05:10 PM, Jarek Poplawski wrote: