Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
[Samba] NFS quotas on Solaris 10
25 views
Skip to first unread message
Christian Manal
Apr 26, 2012, 6:10:01 AM4/26/12
to
Hi list,
I'm running Samba 3.6.4 on Solaris 10 x86. Underlying filesystem is ZFS.
Since updating from 3.6.0, free space on NFS mounted ZFS filesystem,
without a userquota set for the user, is always reported zero. 'quota
-v' and the perl module 'Quota' both report no quota for such file systems.
(Un)setting (ref)quota for those filesystems doesn't change anything.
Any idea how to fix this behavior? A level 10 log of the quota stuff is
attached.
Regards,
Christian Manal
I'm running Samba 3.6.4 on Solaris 10 x86. Underlying filesystem is ZFS.
Since updating from 3.6.0, free space on NFS mounted ZFS filesystem,
without a userquota set for the user, is always reported zero. 'quota
-v' and the perl module 'Quota' both report no quota for such file systems.
(Un)setting (ref)quota for those filesystems doesn't change anything.
Any idea how to fix this behavior? A level 10 log of the quota stuff is
attached.
Regards,
Christian Manal
Gaiseric Vandal
Apr 26, 2012, 10:10:01 AM4/26/12
to
Are these autofs mounts?
Are the nfs v4 mounts - I think Solaris 10 will automatically default
to NFS v4 when mounting from another Solaris 10 server.
Can you run "smbd -b" on the new and old version and see if the new
build omits any crucial modules?
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Are the nfs v4 mounts - I think Solaris 10 will automatically default
to NFS v4 when mounting from another Solaris 10 server.
Can you run "smbd -b" on the new and old version and see if the new
build omits any crucial modules?
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Christian Manal
Apr 26, 2012, 10:30:02 AM4/26/12
to
On 26.04.2012 16:07, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> Are these autofs mounts?
>
> Are the nfs v4 mounts - I think Solaris 10 will automatically default
> to NFS v4 when mounting from another Solaris 10 server.
Yes to both.
> Are these autofs mounts?
>
> Are the nfs v4 mounts - I think Solaris 10 will automatically default
> to NFS v4 when mounting from another Solaris 10 server.
> Can you run "smbd -b" on the new and old version and see if the new
> build omits any crucial modules?
Regards,
Christian Manal
Gaiseric Vandal
Apr 26, 2012, 4:10:02 PM4/26/12
to
I have one share on my samba server which is on top of an autofs mount
point. This is solaris 10 with bundled samba 3.5.10 and zfs. It also
shows 0 free space. I had the same problem with samba 3.4.x compiled
from source code. I think this is just a fundamental Samba issue that
you won't easily solve.
Most Windows applications won't have an issue with this. Adobe Acrobat
will.
point. This is solaris 10 with bundled samba 3.5.10 and zfs. It also
shows 0 free space. I had the same problem with samba 3.4.x compiled
from source code. I think this is just a fundamental Samba issue that
you won't easily solve.
Most Windows applications won't have an issue with this. Adobe Acrobat
will.
Christian Manal
Apr 27, 2012, 3:00:02 AM4/27/12
to
On 26.04.2012 22:08, Gaiseric Vandal wrote:
> I have one share on my samba server which is on top of an autofs mount
> point. This is solaris 10 with bundled samba 3.5.10 and zfs. It also
> shows 0 free space. I had the same problem with samba 3.4.x compiled
> from source code. I think this is just a fundamental Samba issue that
> you won't easily solve.
>
> Most Windows applications won't have an issue with this. Adobe Acrobat
> will.
Might be. But it wasn't an issue until the update. My Win7 clients can't
> I have one share on my samba server which is on top of an autofs mount
> point. This is solaris 10 with bundled samba 3.5.10 and zfs. It also
> shows 0 free space. I had the same problem with samba 3.4.x compiled
> from source code. I think this is just a fundamental Samba issue that
> you won't easily solve.
>
> Most Windows applications won't have an issue with this. Adobe Acrobat
> will.
copy files onto shares anymore, since then. Error message says not
enough disk space.
I had to rebuild Samba without quota support as a workaround. Which now
makes it show wrong sizes for those who actually have a userquota.
I even tried cooking up my own 'get quota command', but that doesn't
seem to be used for NFS quotas.
0 new messages