I suspect that she is closing down her PC without logging out or
something and so appears to be still logged in.
She is using Vista and the server is a Debian Lenny box.
Whenever she tries to access the files on the server the file is
apparently "locked for editing by unknown user".
I cannot find any .~ lockfiles and rebooting both machines does not
resolve this.
The permissions are set to 777 and the owner of the files is this
particular user.
As I say, I'm assuming this is a Samba issue.
Can anyone suggest a way to resolve this?
~ Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
Which version of Samba?
Does smbstatus(1) list the file as being locked? If so, it should give
a pid you can examine. The fuser(1) and lsof(8) commands can track
which process has a file open.
If rebooting the server does not clear the lock, there's either a lock
file or a cached lock record somewhere. Try /var/lib/samba/locking.tdb.
Although it's binary, you can grep(1) it for the filename, or use
tdbdump(8) to display the contents. According to
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_are_tdb_
files.3F, locking.tdb is not required to persist across restarts. I
wouldn't try deleting this when Samba is running; even with Samba shut
down I would rename it rather than deleting it.
However, there has got to be a better solution to stale locks than
restarting Samba and deleting a tdb file every time it happens. Does
the lock clear automatically after a time? There may be lock tuning
parameters that could help - see smb.conf(5) for details.
Moray.
"To err is human. To purr, feline"
On 29 June 2010 10:41, Moray Henderson (ICT) <Moray.H...@ict.om.org> wrote:
> Which version of Samba?
Samba version 3.2.5
> Does smbstatus(1) list the file as being locked? If so, it should give a pid you can examine. The fuser(1) and lsof(8) commands can track which process has a file open.
No. smbstatus returns "No locked files"
> If rebooting the server does not clear the lock, there's either a lock file
> or a cached lock record somewhere. Try /var/lib/samba/locking.tdb.
> Although it's binary, you can grep(1) it for the filename, or use
> tdbdump(8) to display the contents. According to
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Frequently_Asked_Questions#What_are_tdb_files.3F,
> locking.tdb is not required to persist across restarts. I wouldn't try deleting
> this when Samba is running; even with Samba shut down I would rename it
> rather than deleting it.
There is no file in /var/lib/samba/ called 'locking.tdb'
The only files in that directory bearing a date later than 14th Dec
2009 are these three:
passdb.tdb
registry.tdb
wins.dat
`lsof | grep "your-file-name"`
If it locked with any of smbd process, try `kill PID`, where `pid` - smbd
pid you've got previously.
---
wbr, Denis.
2010/6/29 Dave Coventry <dgcov...@gmail.com>
The command:
lsof | grep "Electricity Spreadsheet.ods"
Give no output.
The User says that all the files in the directory are locked. So, I've run
lsof | grep "Water & Elec Consumption"
which gives this output:
bash 4103 root cwd DIR 8,2 4096
67715823 /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption
bash 5466 root cwd DIR 8,2 4096
67715823 /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption
lsof 5619 root cwd DIR 8,2 4096
67715823 /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption
grep 5620 root cwd DIR 8,2 4096
67715823 /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption
lsof 5621 root cwd DIR 8,2 4096
67715823 /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption
# kill 4103
# kill 5466
# kill 5619
-bash: kill: (5619) - No such process
# kill 5620
-bash: kill: (5620) - No such process
# kill 5621
-bash: kill: (5621) - No such process
# lsof | grep "Water & Elec Consumption"
bash 4103 root cwd DIR 8,2 4096
67715823 /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption
All files in /home/patience/Water & Elec Consumption still locked.
:~(
On 29 June 2010 14:04, Klaus Ruebsam <k.ru...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> I´m not at all an expert on Samba, but might it be something quite
> simple as the ampersand-sign (&) within your directory name ?!?
There are other directories which do not have the ampersand, but which
also demonstrate the same behaviour, so I don't think it's the
ampersand.
Yes.
> If not, I suggest you to deploy `3.4 - 3.5` samba branch on test machine and
> check it out with vista again.
The funny thing is it was working fine before. I don't have a test
machine(well, not ons site anyway)
> As I know, there is recommended to use samba version greater than 3.3, if
> you're planning to use it with vista.
> With test machine, you won't break anything in working configuration and
> will check it's compatibility with new windows versions.
>
> I personally use `3.5.3` with windows xp and seven in my local network. The
> server with samba acts as domain controller and there are no any issues with
> xp nor seven.
Okay, I'll look into installing a backports version,then...
The current .tdb files must be in a different location on Debian Lenny
Samba 3.2.5. /var/cache/samba is another common place. Try
testparm -sv | grep directory
In Samba 3.4 the "state directory" and "cache directory" parameters tell
you where to find them. Can't remember now if they were there in 3.2.
If not, use
smbd -b | less
and look for STATEDIR and CACHEDIR in the Samba build options.
Moray.
"To err is human. To purr, feline"
--
Or
find / -name \*.tdb -print