Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 3ec8160..112edb5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -1849,6 +1849,14 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blocked_tasks[3]);
}
}
+
+ rnp = rsp->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1];
+ for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+ if (i > rnp->grphi)
+ rnp++;
+ rsp->rda[i]->mynode = rnp;
+ rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(i, rsp);
+ }
}
/*
@@ -1859,19 +1867,11 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp)
#define RCU_INIT_FLAVOR(rsp, rcu_data) \
do { \
int i; \
- int j; \
- struct rcu_node *rnp; \
\
- rcu_init_one(rsp); \
- rnp = (rsp)->level[NUM_RCU_LVLS - 1]; \
- j = 0; \
for_each_possible_cpu(i) { \
- if (i > rnp[j].grphi) \
- j++; \
- per_cpu(rcu_data, i).mynode = &rnp[j]; \
(rsp)->rda[i] = &per_cpu(rcu_data, i); \
- rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(i, rsp); \
} \
+ rcu_init_one(rsp); \
} while (0)
void __init rcu_init(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Nice!
I have queued this for RCU 2.6.35, with the following commit message:
Shrink the RCU_INIT_FLAVOR() macro by moving all but the
initialization of the ->rda[] array to rcu_init_one().
The call to rcu_init_one() can then be moved to the end
of the RCU_INIT_FLAVOR() macro, which is required because
rcu_boot_init_percpu_data(), which is now called from
rcu_init_one(), depends on the initialization of the ->rda[]
array.
Seem reasonable?
Thanx, Paul
OK
Thanks, Lai