Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

select() on /dev/input/eventX not level-triggered?

25 views
Skip to first unread message

Pavel Machek

unread,
May 19, 2011, 8:00:02 PM5/19/11
to
Hi!

I'm debugging strange behaviour on /dev/input/eventX ... it seems that
select is not behaving level-triggered as it apparently should. I can
reproduce it when hitting windows & alt keys.

Now, I really should rewrite it into C, first, but perhaps someone has
an idea?

Pavel

#!/usr/bin/python
# Thanks to mechomaniac.com
# GPLv2
# Copyright 2011 Pavel Machek

import struct
import time
import select
import os
import random

#
# format of the event structure (int, int, short, short, int)
inputEventFormat = 'iihhi'
inputEventSize = 16
file = open("/dev/input/event5", "rb") # standard binary file input
while 1:
( i, o, e ) = select.select( [file], [], [], 0.5 )
if i == []:
print "timeout event"
continue
event = file.read(inputEventSize)
time.sleep(1)
(time1, time2, type, code, value) = struct.unpack(inputEventFormat, event)
print "type ", type, " code ", code, " value ", value

file.close()


--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Dmitry Torokhov

unread,
May 23, 2011, 2:20:02 PM5/23/11
to
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:50:51AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm debugging strange behaviour on /dev/input/eventX ... it seems that
> select is not behaving level-triggered as it apparently should. I can
> reproduce it when hitting windows & alt keys.
>
> Now, I really should rewrite it into C, first, but perhaps someone has
> an idea?

Is this with next or with mainline? In next we try not to signal that FD
is ready unless we have full packet in the buffer...

FWIW I see python indeed not reading the tail of events (btw the format
should be 'llhhi' and the size on 64 bit arches is 24, not 16) but when
I hacked evtest to use select and non-blockign read it all worked
properly.

Thanks.

--
Dmitry

Pavel Machek

unread,
May 23, 2011, 4:10:01 PM5/23/11
to
On Mon 2011-05-23 11:13:12, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:50:51AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I'm debugging strange behaviour on /dev/input/eventX ... it seems that
> > select is not behaving level-triggered as it apparently should. I can
> > reproduce it when hitting windows & alt keys.
> >
> > Now, I really should rewrite it into C, first, but perhaps someone has
> > an idea?

(Ok, so we agree that select() should mark descriptor as ready as
long as data are available... right?)

> Is this with next or with mainline? In next we try not to signal that FD
> is ready unless we have full packet in the buffer...

2.6.39-rcX mainline.

> FWIW I see python indeed not reading the tail of events (btw the format
> should be 'llhhi' and the size on 64 bit arches is 24, not 16) but when
> I hacked evtest to use select and non-blockign read it all worked
> properly.

It was on x32, but I'll fix that, thanks.

Difference was I'm not using non-blocking read(). It is unusual but
should work AFAICT. Just read one packet when select shows its ready;
if there's more than one, don't loop around read, but rely on select
returning immediately.

I did verify it on strace, so it should not be python artefact.
Pavel

Dmitry Torokhov

unread,
May 23, 2011, 4:50:01 PM5/23/11
to
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:06:22PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> On Mon 2011-05-23 11:13:12, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:50:51AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I'm debugging strange behaviour on /dev/input/eventX ... it seems that
> > > select is not behaving level-triggered as it apparently should. I can
> > > reproduce it when hitting windows & alt keys.
> > >
> > > Now, I really should rewrite it into C, first, but perhaps someone has
> > > an idea?
>
> (Ok, so we agree that select() should mark descriptor as ready as
> long as data are available... right?)
>
> > Is this with next or with mainline? In next we try not to signal that FD
> > is ready unless we have full packet in the buffer...
>
> 2.6.39-rcX mainline.
>
> > FWIW I see python indeed not reading the tail of events (btw the format
> > should be 'llhhi' and the size on 64 bit arches is 24, not 16) but when
> > I hacked evtest to use select and non-blockign read it all worked
> > properly.
>
> It was on x32, but I'll fix that, thanks.
>
> Difference was I'm not using non-blocking read().

Does not matter.

> It is unusual but
> should work AFAICT. Just read one packet when select shows its ready;
> if there's more than one, don't loop around read, but rely on select
> returning immediately.
>
> I did verify it on strace, so it should not be python artefact.

It is artefact of your program, you buffering your input. Use:

file = open("/dev/input/event3", "rb", 0)

Thanks.

--
Dmitry

Pavel Machek

unread,
May 23, 2011, 5:30:01 PM5/23/11
to
On Mon 2011-05-23 13:49:10, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:06:22PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2011-05-23 11:13:12, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 01:50:51AM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Difference was I'm not using non-blocking read().
>
> Does not matter.
>
> > It is unusual but
> > should work AFAICT. Just read one packet when select shows its ready;
> > if there's more than one, don't loop around read, but rely on select
> > returning immediately.
> >
> > I did verify it on strace, so it should not be python artefact.
>
> It is artefact of your program, you buffering your input. Use:
>
> file = open("/dev/input/event3", "rb", 0)

Oops, yes, you are right, that solves it. Thanks... and sorry for the
noise.

0 new messages