[PATCH 00/10] -stable review
Chris Wright
There are 10 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response to
this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please let
us know. If anyone is a maintainer of the proper subsystem, and wants
to add a Signed-off-by: line to the patch, please respond with it.
These patches are sent out with a number of different people on the
Cc: line. If you wish to be a reviewer, please email sta...@kernel.org
to add your name to the list. If you want to be off the reviewer list,
also email us.
Responses should be made by Sun Oct 2, 02:00 UTC. Anything received
after that time, might be too late.
thanks,
the -stable release team
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Hugh Dickins
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ------------------
>
> As I do periodically, I checked to see how far out of sync
> compat_do_execve() has gotten from do_execve(). And as usual there
> was some missing stuff in the former. Perhaps we need some tighter
> consolidation of these two routines to make this less likely to happen
> in the future.
>
> Anyways, on the success path of compat_do_execve() we forget
> to call acct_update_integrals() and update_mem_hiwater(), as
> is done in do_execve().
The patch is good, but for -stable? Spelling corrections next?
Hugh
Chuck Wolber
> -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
> ------------------
>
> I think we should cache the per-socket route(dst_entry) only when the
> IPv6 UDP socket is connect(2)'ed. (which is same as IPv4 UDP send
> behavior)
>
> Signed-off-by: Mitsuru KANDA <m...@linux-ipv6.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chr...@osdl.org>
> ---
%< Snip %<
Does this really qualify as a necessary bug fix?
..Chuck..
--
http://www.quantumlinux.com
Quantum Linux Laboratories, LLC.
ACCELERATING Business with Open Technology
"The measure of the restoration lies in the extent to which we apply
social values more noble than mere monetary profit." - FDR
David S. Miller
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 23:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
> Does this really qualify as a necessary bug fix?
Yes. Without this unconnected ipv6 UDP sockets end up using the wrong
route or IPSEC path.
Mitsuru KANDA / 神田 充
Sorry for log silence, I was on a business trip in last week.
I recreate a patch (of course, which have been tested) ASAP.
At Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:10:25 -0700 (PDT),
Chris Wright
> The patch is good, but for -stable? Spelling corrections next?
Heh, I think you've got a good point. This one doesn't have any real
nasty side-effects that I can see. David do you have objections to
dropping this one from -stable?
thanks,
-chris
David S. Miller
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 14:24:06 -0700
> * Hugh Dickins (hu...@veritas.com) wrote:
> > The patch is good, but for -stable? Spelling corrections next?
>
> Heh, I think you've got a good point. This one doesn't have any real
> nasty side-effects that I can see. David do you have objections to
> dropping this one from -stable?
No objections, you can drop it.
David S. Miller
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2005 12:00:59 -0700
> * Mitsuru KANDA (m...@karaba.org) wrote:
> > Sorry for log silence, I was on a business trip in last week.
> >
> > I recreate a patch (of course, which have been tested) ASAP.
>
> BTW, we dropped this one, since it had possible leak in it. I'll let
> you and DaveM decide when the updated one is ready for -stable.
Will do, thanks Chris.
Chris Wright
> Sorry for log silence, I was on a business trip in last week.
>
> I recreate a patch (of course, which have been tested) ASAP.
BTW, we dropped this one, since it had possible leak in it. I'll let
you and DaveM decide when the updated one is ready for -stable.
thanks,
-chris