Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

linux-next: manual merge of the net tree with the wireless-current tree

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Stephen Rothwell

unread,
Feb 8, 2010, 9:30:01 PM2/8/10
to
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
net/mac80211/scan.c between commit
c0ce77b8323c1a0d4eeef97caf16c0ea971222a9 ("mac80211: fix deferred
hardware scan requests") from the wireless-current tree and commit
af6b63741cc4e4dfd575d06beb333b11a8a6e0c0 ("mac80211: generalise work
handling") from the net tree.

I resolved this the same way it is resolved in the merge of the
wireless-current tree into the wireless tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

John W. Linville

unread,
Feb 8, 2010, 10:30:01 PM2/8/10
to
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 01:24:44PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net tree got a conflict in
> net/mac80211/scan.c between commit
> c0ce77b8323c1a0d4eeef97caf16c0ea971222a9 ("mac80211: fix deferred
> hardware scan requests") from the wireless-current tree and commit
> af6b63741cc4e4dfd575d06beb333b11a8a6e0c0 ("mac80211: generalise work
> handling") from the net tree.
>
> I resolved this the same way it is resolved in the merge of the
> wireless-current tree into the wireless tree.

Maybe it would make sense to pull the wireless trees _before_ the
greater net trees? That way you can get the benefit of my merge
conflict resolutions automatically.

John
--
John W. Linville � � � � � � � �Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linv...@tuxdriver.com � � � � � � � � �might be all we have. �Be ready.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

0 new messages