Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[HELP] Documentation on CPU:/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cache/indexX/shared_cpu_map

136 views
Skip to first unread message

Ren Zhen

unread,
Apr 23, 2013, 9:10:02 AM4/23/13
to
Hi all:
Can anybody help me to understand the usage of 'shared_cpu_map' in
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cache/indexX/.
when I execute the cmd--'#cat shared_cpu_map', it retures '05'.
And my computer use Ubuntu12.04,Intel core i3 CPU.
I have read one email in LKML,it says:

"The patch also adds a bunch of interfaces under
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cache, showing various information about the
caches. Most useful field being shared_cpu_map, which says what caches are
shared among which logical cpus. "

But I still cannot catch the meaning of 'which says what caches
are shared among which logical cpus'.
Thanks.
--
Sincerely,
Ren Zhen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Rob Landley

unread,
Apr 24, 2013, 2:10:01 AM4/24/13
to
On 04/23/2013 08:07:44 AM, Ren Zhen wrote:
> Hi all:
> Can anybody help me to understand the usage of 'shared_cpu_map' in
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cache/indexX/.
> when I execute the cmd--'#cat shared_cpu_map', it retures '05'.
> And my computer use Ubuntu12.04,Intel core i3 CPU.
> I have read one email in LKML,it says:
>
> "The patch also adds a bunch of interfaces under
> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuX/cache, showing various information about
> the
> caches. Most useful field being shared_cpu_map, which says what
> caches are
> shared among which logical cpus. "
>
> But I still cannot catch the meaning of 'which says what caches
> are shared among which logical cpus'.

Sounds like it means the L2 cache would be a communal resource shared
between processors on die. So either processor could fault in cache
lines into that pool of memory, evicting other cache lines as necessary
to make space. So if only one processor was running, it could act like
it had twice as much L2 cache because the memory it faulted in would
(statistically speaking) stay in L2 cache longer before being evicted
to make way for other memory accesses.

At a guess, the bits set (1<<0 and 1<<2 in this case) indicate which
cpus access memory through the same pool of L2 cache.

Rob--
0 new messages