Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

[PATCH 1/2] kvm,ept: pass error code to handler

19 views
Skip to first unread message

Lai Jiangshan

unread,
Jun 11, 2010, 7:40:04 AM6/11/10
to
handle_ept_violation() does not pass error code to
the handler tdp_page_fault().

It means tdp_page_fault() handles the page fault with ignoring
the error code, It will not handle the page fault completely correctly,
and may causes endless page fault.

{
But because there is another bad code in the kvm, This endless page faulting
never occur. The bad code: kvm always set pte writable.

negative * negative = positive, WTF!!

Next patch will fix this bad code.
}

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index c7565ea..6362dcc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
trace_kvm_page_fault(gpa, exit_qualification);
- return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa & PAGE_MASK, 0);
+ return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa & PAGE_MASK, exit_qualification);
}

static u64 ept_rsvd_mask(u64 spte, int level)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Marcelo Tosatti

unread,
Jun 11, 2010, 4:40:03 PM6/11/10
to
On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 07:30:24PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> handle_ept_violation() does not pass error code to
> the handler tdp_page_fault().
>
> It means tdp_page_fault() handles the page fault with ignoring
> the error code, It will not handle the page fault completely correctly,
> and may causes endless page fault.
>
> {
> But because there is another bad code in the kvm, This endless page faulting
> never occur. The bad code: kvm always set pte writable.
>
> negative * negative = positive, WTF!!
>
> Next patch will fix this bad code.
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <la...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index c7565ea..6362dcc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -3470,7 +3470,7 @@ static int handle_ept_violation(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> trace_kvm_page_fault(gpa, exit_qualification);
> - return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa & PAGE_MASK, 0);
> + return kvm_mmu_page_fault(vcpu, gpa & PAGE_MASK, exit_qualification);

exit_qualification & 0x2, because bit 1 (write fault) of exit
qualification is the only one that matches x86's pagefault error codes.

0 new messages