The size argument to zalloc should be the size of desired structure,
not the pointer to it.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@expression@
expression *x;
@@
x =
<+...
-sizeof(x)
+sizeof(*x)
...+>// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>
---
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -u -p a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ struct tracepoint_path *tracepoint_id_to
if (id == config) {
closedir(evt_dir);
closedir(sys_dir);
- path = zalloc(sizeof(path));
+ path = zalloc(sizeof(*path));
path->system = malloc(MAX_EVENT_LENGTH);
if (!path->system) {
free(path);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majo...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
perf tools: Correct size computation in tracepoint_id_to_path()
The size argument to zalloc should be the size of desired
structure, not the pointer to it.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@expression@
expression *x;
@@
x =
<+...
-sizeof(x)
+sizeof(*x)
...+>// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <ju...@diku.dk>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zi...@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <ac...@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fwei...@gmail.com>
LKML-Reference: <Pine.LNX.4.64.09...@ask.diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mi...@elte.hu>
---
tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
index 9e5dbd6..448a13b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ struct tracepoint_path *tracepoint_id_to_path(u64 config)
Julia Lawall schrieb:
and zalloc() can not fail ?
re,
wh