info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Inclusive terminology (instead of master/slave) for network bonding/LACP
13 views
Skip to first unread message
Ralph Aichinger
Feb 22, 2024, 5:40:05 AMFeb 22
to
Hello!
I know this is a loaded topic. I really don't want to discuss the
political aspects of the "why", but just want to know the facts, i.e.
how far this has been progressed in Debian.
Is there anything planned to get "master/slave" terminology out of
network bonding/LACP in Debian (or Linux kernel or whoever decides
this terminology)? I know these things are slow to change, just
wondering.
https://wiki.debian.org/Bonding
/ralph
I know this is a loaded topic. I really don't want to discuss the
political aspects of the "why", but just want to know the facts, i.e.
how far this has been progressed in Debian.
Is there anything planned to get "master/slave" terminology out of
network bonding/LACP in Debian (or Linux kernel or whoever decides
this terminology)? I know these things are slow to change, just
wondering.
https://wiki.debian.org/Bonding
/ralph
0 new messages