mount hfs+ partition
kansa...@mac.com
debian-31r3-powerpc-netinst.iso install on a wallstreet:
old world, sonnet G3 500, 318 meg ram, cdrom, floppy
Turned off journaling on my osx volume and checked and it is says no
under journaling
I have 2 mac partitions:
/dev/hda9 osx hfs+
/dev/hda10 os9 hfs+
tried to mount with:
debian:~# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hda10 /mnt/os9
mount: unknown filesystem type 'hfsplus'
debian:~# hmount /dev/hda10 /mnt/os9
Volume name is "BootX" (locked)
Volume was created on Mon Sep 18 19:10:46 2006
Volume as last modified on Mon Oct 30 09:24/05 2006
Volume has 0 bytes free
Nobody seems to be able to help me get the eth0 working so I am going
to nuke debian install and start again.
But I would like to get a few files off before I do so I need to
mount either my os9, osX, or floppy or usb memory stick....
all of which have been unsuccessful...
Thanks in advance,
Barry
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-powe...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Clive Menzies
> This is what I have to work with:
>
> debian-31r3-powerpc-netinst.iso install on a wallstreet:
> old world, sonnet G3 500, 318 meg ram, cdrom, floppy
>
> Turned off journaling on my osx volume and checked and it is says no
> under journaling
> I have 2 mac partitions:
> /dev/hda9 osx hfs+
> /dev/hda10 os9 hfs+
>
> tried to mount with:
>
> debian:~# mount -t hfsplus /dev/hda10 /mnt/os9
> mount: unknown filesystem type 'hfsplus'
>
> debian:~# hmount /dev/hda10 /mnt/os9
> Volume name is "BootX" (locked)
> Volume was created on Mon Sep 18 19:10:46 2006
> Volume as last modified on Mon Oct 30 09:24/05 2006
> Volume has 0 bytes free
During the install if you <go back> during the install, you get the
dropped into a menu from which you can select to load the hfs modules
which should let you mount the mac partition.
I can't remember which option exactly but it's something like 'load
installer components'.
HTH
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
brian
shame, shame both of you: Read the Fine Manual.
hfs plus is mounted via -t ufs, there is no
such thing as -t hpfsplus !!!!
("man mount" for whole story)
brian
____________________________________________________________________________________
Low, Low, Low Rates! Check out Yahoo! Messenger's cheap PC-to-Phone call rates
(http://voice.yahoo.com)
Ralf Saalmüller
Hash: SHA1
Am 31.10.2006 um 07:54 schrieb brian:
> shame, shame both of you: Read the Fine Manual.
>
> hfs plus is mounted via -t ufs, there is no
> such thing as -t hpfsplus !!!!
>
> ("man mount" for whole story)
>
> brian
Sorry brian, I don't bother what the man mount does say, as I use
hfsplus for some years now on at least 3 debian installations and two
Ubuntu. hfsplus is alive!
One thing you might to is apt-get install hfsplus as it is a package
within otherfs. And debian is well known not always getting the whole
thing done. On the other side, hfsplus is part of the ppc kernel 2.4
and 2.6.
There is such a thing as -t hfsplus.
Ralf
- ---
Ralf Saalmüller
Amonshöhe 26
97437 Hassfurt
Germany
PPCNUX-Team
http://www.ppcnux.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFFRwW2tKcsE7vsbMERApSYAJ9s+8BUcWcjPicvPEMdzS9nMlB72wCfSgT7
pevRDQFfAJUsklKhUQ+/+BY=
=s5Sz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Lionel Artom-Ginzburg
brian
hfsplus partition with
mount -t ufs ufstype=openstep
as describe in man page for mount. if you can't
trust this, you surely are not using /usr/share/doc,
where most things have not been updated since woody ?
where do you get your information when things change,
then, do you read the source code ?
the package hfsplus, does not mount actually its
a virtual thing.
but the real hangup in both cases is its read only.
so for the original poster of this thread, no help
really.
to copy things back from linux to mac os you need
an plain hfs partion, you can use mount -t hfs for
that or you can use the hfs package.
none of this has changed for me in the last year from
2.6.8 through 2.6.18 kernel.
ok, there are modules for all those kernel versions,
(which means what -- that the util packages use them,
probably, not necesarily the mount utility ...)
but in the absence of documentation or
in the presence of obsolete misleading documentation,
what ?
i don't have psychic powers, i can't cook up
procedures
out of my imagination.
--- Lionel Artom-Ginzburg <lion...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is a problem with the install (2.6.8-3)
> on the r3 sarge CD,
> actually. Earlier versions (both r1 and r2), even
> if they didn't have
> hfsplus built into the kernel, at least had it as a
> loadable .ko module on
> the installer's initrd. Not the case with r3. I
> presume it's installed on
> the /target drive, and I suppose an insmod from
> there will work just as
> well, but I really get the impression that the
> installer initrd is
> as barebones as they come.
>
>
>
> On 10/31/06, Ralf Saalm�ller
> <ra...@mail.ralf-saalmueller.de> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Am 31.10.2006 um 07:54 schrieb brian:
> >
> > > shame, shame both of you: Read the Fine Manual.
> > >
> > > hfs plus is mounted via -t ufs, there is no
> > > such thing as -t hpfsplus !!!!
> > >
> > > ("man mount" for whole story)
> > >
> > > brian
> >
> > Sorry brian, I don't bother what the man mount
> does say, as I use
> > hfsplus for some years now on at least 3 debian
> installations and two
> > Ubuntu. hfsplus is alive!
> >
> > One thing you might to is apt-get install hfsplus
> as it is a package
> > within otherfs. And debian is well known not
> always getting the whole
> > thing done. On the other side, hfsplus is part of
> the ppc kernel 2.4
> > and 2.6.
> >
> > There is such a thing as -t hfsplus.
> >
> > Ralf
> >
> > - ---
> > Ralf Saalm�ller
> > Amonsh�he 26
> > 97437 Hassfurt
> > Germany
> > PPCNUX-Team
> > http://www.ppcnux.org
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
> >
> >
>
iD8DBQFFRwW2tKcsE7vsbMERApSYAJ9s+8BUcWcjPicvPEMdzS9nMlB72wCfSgT7
> > pevRDQFfAJUsklKhUQ+/+BY=
> > =s5Sz
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> >
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
We have the perfect Group for you. Check out the handy changes to Yahoo! Groups
(http://groups.yahoo.com)
Ruben
At Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:55:19 -0800 (PST), brian wrote:
>
> honest to god, i have only been able to mount hfsplus partition with
> mount -t ufs ufstype=openstep
I just want to confirm that one can mount hfsplus partitions used by
MacOSX on linux in read-write mode. However, you should make sure
that you disable the journal on the partition, because the journal is
not supported on linux. Note also that there is currently no support
to check the filesystem on linux.
On my system:
ruben@guava ~ $ grep hfsplus /etc/fstab
/dev/hda7 /mnt/mac hfsplus ro 0 0
/dev/hda8 /mnt/osx hfsplus ro,noauto 0 0
ruben@guava ~ $ mount | grep hfsplus
/dev/hda7 on /mnt/mac type hfsplus (ro)
Yup, it is mounted read-only, because I only need to use that
partition read-only. If it is mounted read-write and for some reason
the partition is not umounted cleanly, I will have to reboot in OSX to
have the partition checked... so that's why I just mount it read-only,
but I used to mount it read-write before and writing did work.
> the package hfsplus, does not mount actually its a virtual thing.
hmmm...?
ruben@guava ~ $ dpkg -L hfsplus
/.
/usr
/usr/bin
/usr/bin/hpmount
/usr/bin/hpumount
/usr/bin/hpls
/usr/bin/hpcd
/usr/bin/hpcopy
/usr/bin/hppwd
/usr/bin/hpfsck
/usr/bin/hprm
/usr/bin/hpmkdir
/usr/share
/usr/share/linda
/usr/share/linda/overrides
/usr/share/doc
/usr/share/doc/hfsplus
/usr/share/doc/hfsplus/copyright
/usr/share/doc/hfsplus/changelog.gz
/usr/share/doc/hfsplus/changelog.Debian.gz
/usr/share/man
/usr/share/man/man7
/usr/share/man/man7/hfsplus.7.gz
/usr/share/man/man1
/usr/share/man/man1/hpfsck.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hpls.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hpmkdir.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hpmount.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hppwd.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hprm.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hpcd.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hpcopy.1.gz
/usr/share/man/man1/hpumount.1.gz
Hmm.. and now I see there is a hpfsck... well, I read long time ago
that someone was trying to port it from the open source OSX
parts.. must have been ported in the mean time then.
> but the real hangup in both cases is its read only.
> so for the original poster of this thread, no help
> really.
guava ~ # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/mac
guava ~ # mount | grep hfsplus
/dev/hda7 on /mnt/mac type hfsplus (rw)
guava ~ # touch /mnt/mac/blahblah
guava ~ # ls -l /mnt/mac/blahblah
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Nov 1 12:28 /mnt/mac/blahblah
> none of this has changed for me in the last year from
> 2.6.8 through 2.6.18 kernel.
I've been using that HFS+ partition already for a long
time... probably about a year. And it's just with regular kernel
support and the hfsplus package. (on Debian unstable)
ruben@guava ~ $ grep HFS /usr/src/linux/.config
CONFIG_HFS_FS=y
CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS=y
Anyways.. can't help with the problem of the original poster.. like
someone else said.. it seems likely that the appropriate kernel module
is missing and/or the hfsplus package.
Ruben
Brad Boyer
> At Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:55:19 -0800 (PST), brian wrote:
> > honest to god, i have only been able to mount hfsplus partition with
> > mount -t ufs ufstype=openstep
This is what you would use to mount a UFS partition as created by osx.
It definitely would not work on an HFS+ filesystem.
> > none of this has changed for me in the last year from
> > 2.6.8 through 2.6.18 kernel.
>
> I've been using that HFS+ partition already for a long
> time... probably about a year. And it's just with regular kernel
> support and the hfsplus package. (on Debian unstable)
>
> ruben@guava ~ $ grep HFS /usr/src/linux/.config
> CONFIG_HFS_FS=y
> CONFIG_HFSPLUS_FS=y
>
>
> Anyways.. can't help with the problem of the original poster.. like
> someone else said.. it seems likely that the appropriate kernel module
> is missing and/or the hfsplus package.
My G5 running sarge has the hfsplus.ko module.
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 88490 Nov 23 2005 /lib/modules/2.6.8-power4-smp/kernel/fs/hfsplus/hfsplus.ko
This is the default kernel I've been using for ages.
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name Version Description
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii kernel-image-2 2.6.8-12sarge1 Linux kernel image for 2.6.8-power4-smp
I agree that the kernel that the original poster was using was likely
misconfigured in some way to not have the hfsplus code. It's been
available in Debian kernels for a long time.
Brad Boyer
fl...@allandria.com
Børge Holen
--
---
Børge
Kennel Arivene
http://www.arivene.net
---
leandro noferini
> I've used hfsplus on daily basis.
[...]
Me too but what we have not is a tool do check/repair hfs+ partitions
when they were unmounted uncorrectly.
Personally I use mol for this.
--
Ciao
leandro
Un esteso e "normale" uso della crittografia è il sistema più forte
per rivendicare il diritto alla privacy nelle comunicazioni
telematiche: come tutti i diritti e come i muscoli se non viene
esercitato costantemente si atrofizza e va perso.