Simon McVittie
unread,Nov 21, 2023, 12:30:03 PM11/21/23You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to
Control: retitle -1 general: on hppa, command line of any program invocation is
limited to less than 3544 bytes
Control: severity -1 wishlist
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 17:26:46 +0100, Bruno Haible wrote:
> I'm using Debian GNU/Linux on hppa, in a virtual machine emulated by QEMU
> 8.0.2.
hppa is a "ports" architecture, which is maintained by its port
maintainers but not supported by the Debian project as a whole. Debian 6.0
was the last release where hppa was supported as a release architecture,
and reached EOL in early 2012.
Full text quoted below for the hppa porters (cc'd).
/bin/echo `seq 913` seems to work on both 32-bit and 64-bit release
architectures (tested 32-bit armhf on the porterbox "abel" and 64-bit
amd64 on my laptop) so this appears to be an architecture-specific
problem, presumably caused by either different configuration,
architecture-specific code paths, or the version of some component being
out of date on hppa.
> $ uname -srm
> Linux 6.3.0-2-parisc parisc
>
> In this machine, for the invocation of any program, the length of the command
> line (= all arguments together) is limited to less than 3544 bytes.
>
> How to reproduce:
>
> In bash:
> $ /bin/echo `seq 913`
> -bash: /bin/echo: Argument list too long
>
> In dash:
> $ /bin/echo `seq 913`
> dash: 1: /bin/echo: Argument list too long
>
> I also see this while doing "make check" of packages that have more than 1000
> tests. So, it appears to be a general problem.
>
> The values returned by getconf don't match the reality:
> $ getconf ARG_MAX
> 2097152
> $ getconf _POSIX_ARG_MAX
> 2097152
>
> I have looked at the values of several files in /sys/kernel and
> /proc/sys/kernel, without finding the cause.
>
> For comparison, in a different VM, running "Linux 6.3.7-t2 parisc" (from the
> T2-SDE distribution), I don't observe this bug. Both machines have the same
> amount of "physical" RAM: 256 MiB.
>
> The ulimit values don't appear to be the cause, because they are similar in
> the two machines:
> In the Debian VM (with the bug):
> $ ulimit -a
> real-time non-blocking time (microseconds, -R) unlimited
> core file size (blocks, -c) 0
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
> scheduling priority (-e) 0
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> pending signals (-i) 849
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 65536
> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
> open files (-n) 1024
> pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
> real-time priority (-r) 0
> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
> max user processes (-u) 849
> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
> file locks (-x) unlimited
> In the T2-SDE machine, with no bug:
> $ ulimit -a
> real-time non-blocking time (microseconds, -R) unlimited
> core file size (blocks, -c) 1048575
> data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited
> scheduling priority (-e) 0
> file size (blocks, -f) unlimited
> pending signals (-i) 909
> max locked memory (kbytes, -l) 8192
> max memory size (kbytes, -m) unlimited
> open files (-n) 1024
> pipe size (512 bytes, -p) 8
> POSIX message queues (bytes, -q) 819200
> real-time priority (-r) 0
> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192
> cpu time (seconds, -t) unlimited
> max user processes (-u) 909
> virtual memory (kbytes, -v) unlimited
> file locks (-x) unlimited