Hi,
This patch has a few fixes for what looks to me like typos/grammar issues
in the dev-ref. Apologies if I've changed the meaning of something in
the process.
kk
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.3
APT prefers stable
APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.30.7-libre-fshoppe1 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
developers-reference depends on no packages.
Versions of packages developers-reference recommends:
ii debian-policy 3.8.0.1 Debian Policy Manual and related d
Versions of packages developers-reference suggests:
pn doc-base <none> (no description available)
-- no debconf information
On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Karl Goetz wrote:
> -do send a summary after filing the bugs to the debian-devel list instead.
> +send a summary to the debian-devel list after filing the bugs instead.
Ok.
> Please include a <literal>Closes:
> -bug#<replaceable>nnnnn</replaceable></literal> entry in the changelog of the
> +#<replaceable>nnnnn</replaceable></literal> entry in the changelog of the
Both are correct. I prefer the shorter version though, changed.
> -It is a very active channel since usually over 150 people are always logged in.
> +It is a very active channel; it will typically have a minimum of 150 people
> +at any time of day.
Ok.
> <literal>testing</literal> as they approach stability, <literal>sid</literal>
> itself is never released. As well as the usual contents of a Debian
> distribution, <literal>sid</literal> contains packages for architectures which
> -are not yet officially supported or released by Debian. These architectures
> -are planned to be integrated into the mainstream distribution at some future
> -date.
> +are not yet (or no longer) officially supported or released by Debian. These
> +architectures are planned to be integrated into the mainstream distribution at
> +some future date.
That change is wrong. sid doesn't contain removed architectures (or only
temporarily). For example, "arm" is not in sid while it was in lenny.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100214174209.GB3254@rivendell
> tag 567233 + pending
> thanks
>
> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010, Karl Goetz wrote:
>
> > <literal>testing</literal> as they approach stability,
> > <literal>sid</literal> itself is never released. As well as the
> > usual contents of a Debian distribution, <literal>sid</literal>
> > contains packages for architectures which -are not yet officially
> > supported or released by Debian. These architectures -are planned
> > to be integrated into the mainstream distribution at some future
> > -date. +are not yet (or no longer) officially supported or released
> > by Debian. These +architectures are planned to be integrated into
> > the mainstream distribution at +some future date.
>
> That change is wrong. sid doesn't contain removed architectures (or
> only temporarily). For example, "arm" is not in sid while it was in
> lenny.
My mistake, I'll have to do some more reading in that area :)
kk
--
Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS)
Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer
http://www.kgoetz.id.au
No, I won't join your social networking group