info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
po pages
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Thomas Lange
Jan 2, 2024, 11:40:03 AMJan 2
to
Hi all,
on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
The same applies to a listing on the bottom of the page called "Packages already i18n-ed"
This long listing is not needed because we have a link at the top to
"POT files" which includes the same information in a different format.
Do I miss any useful usage of those long lists?
If we remove those listings, the po pages will provide the same
information but in a cleaner appearance.
BTW, I think the same applies for po4a and po-debconf.
--
regards Thomas
on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
The same applies to a listing on the bottom of the page called "Packages already i18n-ed"
This long listing is not needed because we have a link at the top to
"POT files" which includes the same information in a different format.
Do I miss any useful usage of those long lists?
If we remove those listings, the po pages will provide the same
information but in a cleaner appearance.
BTW, I think the same applies for po4a and po-debconf.
--
regards Thomas
Holger Wansing
Jan 2, 2024, 12:30:04 PMJan 2
to
Hi,
Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>:
>Hi all,
>
>on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
>we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
>abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
>list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
>languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
>and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
Yes, exactly the same came to my mind yesterday.
+1
>The same applies to a listing on the bottom of the page called "Packages already i18n-ed"
>This long listing is not needed because we have a link at the top to
>"POT files" which includes the same information in a different format.
>
>Do I miss any useful usage of those long lists?
>If we remove those listings, the po pages will provide the same
>information but in a cleaner appearance.
The "Packages already i18n-ed" list irritates me:
there are many packages in that listing, but the package name is
not a link to the pot file, as it is the case for the others.
And those packages are missing in the "POT files" page.
So I don't know which list is the better one or how they work or
belong together...
>BTW, I think the same applies for po4a and po-debconf.
Correct.
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>:
>Hi all,
>
>on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
>we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
>abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
>list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
>languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
>and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
+1
>The same applies to a listing on the bottom of the page called "Packages already i18n-ed"
>This long listing is not needed because we have a link at the top to
>"POT files" which includes the same information in a different format.
>
>Do I miss any useful usage of those long lists?
>If we remove those listings, the po pages will provide the same
>information but in a cleaner appearance.
there are many packages in that listing, but the package name is
not a link to the pot file, as it is the case for the others.
And those packages are missing in the "POT files" page.
So I don't know which list is the better one or how they work or
belong together...
>BTW, I think the same applies for po4a and po-debconf.
Holger
--
Sent from /e/ OS on Fairphone3
Holger Wansing
Jan 7, 2024, 6:40:04 AMJan 7
to
Hi,
Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org> wrote (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:20:36 +0100):
> Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>:
> >on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
> >we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
> >abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
> >list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
> >languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
> >and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
>
> Yes, exactly the same came to my mind yesterday.
>
> +1
No objections so far, so let's go for it?
--
Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org> wrote (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:20:36 +0100):
> Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>:
> >on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
> >we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
> >abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
> >list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
> >languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
> >and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
>
> Yes, exactly the same came to my mind yesterday.
>
> +1
--
Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org>
PGP-Fingerprint: 496A C6E8 1442 4B34 8508 3529 59F1 87CA 156E B076
Thomas Lange
Jan 7, 2024, 6:50:04 AMJan 7
to
>>>>> On Sun, 7 Jan 2024 12:31:54 +0100, Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org> said:
> Hi,
> Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org> wrote (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:20:36 +0100):
>> Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>:
>> >on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
>> >we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
>> >abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
>> >list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
>> >languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
>> >and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
>>
>> Yes, exactly the same came to my mind yesterday.
>>
>> +1
> No objections so far, so let's go for it?
Yes, feel free to do the changes yourself.
> Hi,
> Holger Wansing <hwan...@mailbox.org> wrote (Tue, 02 Jan 2024 18:20:36 +0100):
>> Am 2. Januar 2024 17:39:10 MEZ schrieb Thomas Lange <la...@cs.uni-koeln.de>:
>> >on the po pages like https://www.debian.org/international/l10n/po/af
>> >we have a long listing of the languages at the top with their
>> >abbreviation (like aa de fr) but we also have a link to the language
>> >list at the top, which is the same list but with the names of the
>> >languages. IMO it sufficient to keep the link to the "Language list"
>> >and we can remove the long liststing of the languages on the po pages.
>>
>> Yes, exactly the same came to my mind yesterday.
>>
>> +1
> No objections so far, so let's go for it?
--
regards Thomas
Holger Wansing
Jan 7, 2024, 7:30:03 AMJan 7
to
Hi,
Done.
0 new messages