Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#1037425: linux-kbuild-6.1: please add Breaks against obsolete *-dkms packages
137 views
Skip to first unread message
Andreas Beckmann
Jun 12, 2023, 11:40:03 AM6/12/23
to
Package: linux-kbuild-6.1
Version: 6.1.27-1
Severity: serious
User: debi...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
one change in dkms in bookworm is that it actually returns an error when
failing to build a module, as a result
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms may fail and cause
linux-headers-<MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH>-<ABI>-<FLAVOR>.postinst to fail.
(Up to bullseye, dkms returned 0 on failure and the failure was only
noticable when someone studied the install/upgrade log.)
As a consequence, if cruft *-dkms packages are still installed, but fail
to build the module for current kernels, this may result in upgrade
failures. Therefore please add Breaks against cruft *-dkms packages that
may be left over from previous releases to ensure they get removed.
I chose linux-kbuild-6.1 for the addition of these Breaks since all
linux-headers-* packages depend on that.
I'm trying to build a list:
Breaks:
# in bullseye, not in bookworm:
nvidia-tesla-418-kernel-dkms (<< 418.226.00-9~),
nvidia-tesla-460-kernel-dkms (<< 460.106.00-9~),
# in buster, not in bullseye
sl-modem-dkms (<< 2.9.11~20110321-16.0),
# in stretch, not in buster
blktap-dkms (<< 2.0.93-0.10.0),
# in jessie, not in stretch
oss4-dkms (<< 4.2-build2020-1~),
# in wheezy, not in jessie
blcr-dkms (<< 0.8.6~b3-1.0),
Maybe there are more, but I haven't seen them, yet.
In case this was fixed in sid (but not in bookworm), I've used that
version suffixed with '~', otherwise (i.e. not fixed in sid) I've
invented a version based on the last version in sid with NMU suffix .0
The typical upgrade failure if one of these obsolete packages is still
installed looks like this:
...
Setting up linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 (6.1.27-1) ...
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms:
dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-9-amd64.
Sign command: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.1/scripts/sign-file
Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key
Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub
Certificate or key are missing, generating self signed certificate for MOK...
openssl not found, can't generate key and certificate.
Building module:
Cleaning build area...
make -j84 KERNELRELEASE=6.1.0-9-amd64 -C /lib/modules/6.1.0-9-amd64/build M=/var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.5/build...(bad exit status: 2)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.5/build/make.log for more information.
dkms autoinstall on 6.1.0-9-amd64/x86_64 failed for blcr(10)
Error! One or more modules failed to install during autoinstall.
Refer to previous errors for more information.
dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.0-9-amd64 failed!
run-parts: /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 11
Failed to process /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64.postinst line 11.
dpkg: error processing package linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 (--configure):
installed linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Setting up gnupg (2.2.40-1.1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-headers-amd64:
linux-headers-amd64 depends on linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 (= 6.1.27-1); however:
Package linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing package linux-headers-amd64 (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Processing triggers for systemd (252.6-1.1~deb12anbe1) ...
Processing triggers for debianutils (5.7-0.4) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.36-9) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64
linux-headers-amd64
while on bullseye the ignored failure looked like this:
...
Setting up linux-headers-5.10.0-22-amd64 (5.10.178-3) ...
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms:
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.10.0-22-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.5/build/make.log for more information.
Andreas
Version: 6.1.27-1
Severity: serious
User: debi...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
one change in dkms in bookworm is that it actually returns an error when
failing to build a module, as a result
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms may fail and cause
linux-headers-<MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH>-<ABI>-<FLAVOR>.postinst to fail.
(Up to bullseye, dkms returned 0 on failure and the failure was only
noticable when someone studied the install/upgrade log.)
As a consequence, if cruft *-dkms packages are still installed, but fail
to build the module for current kernels, this may result in upgrade
failures. Therefore please add Breaks against cruft *-dkms packages that
may be left over from previous releases to ensure they get removed.
I chose linux-kbuild-6.1 for the addition of these Breaks since all
linux-headers-* packages depend on that.
I'm trying to build a list:
Breaks:
# in bullseye, not in bookworm:
nvidia-tesla-418-kernel-dkms (<< 418.226.00-9~),
nvidia-tesla-460-kernel-dkms (<< 460.106.00-9~),
# in buster, not in bullseye
sl-modem-dkms (<< 2.9.11~20110321-16.0),
# in stretch, not in buster
blktap-dkms (<< 2.0.93-0.10.0),
# in jessie, not in stretch
oss4-dkms (<< 4.2-build2020-1~),
# in wheezy, not in jessie
blcr-dkms (<< 0.8.6~b3-1.0),
Maybe there are more, but I haven't seen them, yet.
In case this was fixed in sid (but not in bookworm), I've used that
version suffixed with '~', otherwise (i.e. not fixed in sid) I've
invented a version based on the last version in sid with NMU suffix .0
The typical upgrade failure if one of these obsolete packages is still
installed looks like this:
...
Setting up linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 (6.1.27-1) ...
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms:
dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 6.1.0-9-amd64.
Sign command: /usr/lib/linux-kbuild-6.1/scripts/sign-file
Signing key: /var/lib/dkms/mok.key
Public certificate (MOK): /var/lib/dkms/mok.pub
Certificate or key are missing, generating self signed certificate for MOK...
openssl not found, can't generate key and certificate.
Building module:
Cleaning build area...
make -j84 KERNELRELEASE=6.1.0-9-amd64 -C /lib/modules/6.1.0-9-amd64/build M=/var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.5/build...(bad exit status: 2)
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 6.1.0-9-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.5/build/make.log for more information.
dkms autoinstall on 6.1.0-9-amd64/x86_64 failed for blcr(10)
Error! One or more modules failed to install during autoinstall.
Refer to previous errors for more information.
dkms: autoinstall for kernel: 6.1.0-9-amd64 failed!
run-parts: /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 11
Failed to process /etc/kernel/header_postinst.d at /var/lib/dpkg/info/linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64.postinst line 11.
dpkg: error processing package linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 (--configure):
installed linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Setting up gnupg (2.2.40-1.1) ...
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of linux-headers-amd64:
linux-headers-amd64 depends on linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 (= 6.1.27-1); however:
Package linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64 is not configured yet.
dpkg: error processing package linux-headers-amd64 (--configure):
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
Processing triggers for systemd (252.6-1.1~deb12anbe1) ...
Processing triggers for debianutils (5.7-0.4) ...
Processing triggers for libc-bin (2.36-9) ...
Errors were encountered while processing:
linux-headers-6.1.0-9-amd64
linux-headers-amd64
while on bullseye the ignored failure looked like this:
...
Setting up linux-headers-5.10.0-22-amd64 (5.10.178-3) ...
/etc/kernel/header_postinst.d/dkms:
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.10.0-22-amd64 (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/blcr/0.8.5/build/make.log for more information.
Andreas
Debian Bug Tracking System
Jun 12, 2023, 12:50:03 PM6/12/23
to
Processing control commands:
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #1037425 [linux-kbuild-6.1] linux-kbuild-6.1: please add Breaks against obsolete *-dkms packages
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-kbuild-6.1' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux/6.1.27-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1037425 to the same values previously set
> severity -1 important
Bug #1037425 [src:linux] linux-kbuild-6.1: please add Breaks against obsolete *-dkms packages
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1037425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
> reassign -1 src:linux
Bug #1037425 [linux-kbuild-6.1] linux-kbuild-6.1: please add Breaks against obsolete *-dkms packages
Bug reassigned from package 'linux-kbuild-6.1' to 'src:linux'.
No longer marked as found in versions linux/6.1.27-1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1037425 to the same values previously set
> severity -1 important
Bug #1037425 [src:linux] linux-kbuild-6.1: please add Breaks against obsolete *-dkms packages
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
--
1037425: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1037425
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bastian Blank
Jun 12, 2023, 12:50:04 PM6/12/23
to
Control: reassign -1 src:linux
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> As a consequence, if cruft *-dkms packages are still installed, but fail
> to build the module for current kernels, this may result in upgrade
> failures. Therefore please add Breaks against cruft *-dkms packages that
> may be left over from previous releases to ensure they get removed.
> I chose linux-kbuild-6.1 for the addition of these Breaks since all
> linux-headers-* packages depend on that.
And why not at dkms? And how does this help in the long term, as every
kernel release breaks modules?
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
Control: severity -1 important
On Mon, Jun 12, 2023 at 05:31:53PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> As a consequence, if cruft *-dkms packages are still installed, but fail
> to build the module for current kernels, this may result in upgrade
> failures. Therefore please add Breaks against cruft *-dkms packages that
> may be left over from previous releases to ensure they get removed.
> I chose linux-kbuild-6.1 for the addition of these Breaks since all
> linux-headers-* packages depend on that.
kernel release breaks modules?
Bastian
--
Those who hate and fight must stop themselves -- otherwise it is not stopped.
-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
0 new messages