You are distorting facts.
You are not talking about "capable MUA"s, you are talking about
"MUAs which happen to share the features I like".
Features which are not official standards like rfc822 is.
> > And finally, [rfc822] example A.3.3 EXPLICITLY shows that "reply-to" is
> > NOT exclusively for "who wrote the message". It is for
> > "Where do you want replies to normally go to"
>
> my ML-software do not have a builtin AI to determine where replies of a
> specific recipient should normally go.
Very funny. But not relevant.
The primary purpose of mailing lists like debian-devel, is for discussion
ON THE LIST. This is implicitly a part of the debian
Developer's Reference, about "Dont Cc people on the mailing list unless
they specifically ask for one".
It also explicitly says, "Anyone who posts to a mailing list should read it
to see the responses."
[http://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/developers-reference/ch-servers.html#s-mailing-lists]
Therefore, replies, aka "responses" to email on debian-devel should
"normally go" to the list.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
The purpose of this mailing list is to facilitate communication between
developers working on Debian.
As such, most of this thread is offtopic. Please take it elsewhere.
--
see shy jo
Agreed. I've been waiting for someone to say this.
- Tal
> --
> see shy jo
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev...@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
>
--
/------------------------------\ /------------------------------\
| Tal Danzig t...@libranet.com |--| Linux by Libranet |
| |--| The TOP Desktop |
| |--| http://www.libranet.com |
\------------------------------/ \------------------------------/