Hi,
i indent to package XForms4Perl [1], a nice extension to Perl that
allows to call the Xforms [2] GUI api from a standard Perl script.
The package will contain a modification of the original GUI-builder
fdesign (a converter) to build a GUI and to generate ready-to-go
Perl-programms.
XForms4Perl is GPL'ed, but XForms by itself is GPL'ed, so the new
package libxforms-perl will be in non-free.
[1] http://franz.ww.TU-Berlin.DE/pub/authors/Martin_Bartlett (down?)
[2] http://bragg.phys.uwm.edu/xforms
-kk-
debian: k...@debian.org
work: k...@sbs.de
priv: k...@sesom.de http://www.kettner.nu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBN008Mi860d+N9jZ9AQFkhwP/fAZzSvf72FgMktr+A9G5gGagj4dSZ71j
Tscp/jxbDQUDbKAgxWVu5PtFBQCI6r7jUjXQnjUz75XOIVVMgmRkbxnBNmsPBxYm
rinGDHWesAAWDZaU4556k3RAu7BKpOGb7nc+NagJNLE2jnEnooYjx2oa4sJVrrDg
j3gmdP42RvQ=
=8BfQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Not, sure but i think it should go in contrib (as free software depending on
non free one ?).
Friendly,
Sven LUTHER
> XForms4Perl is GPL'ed, but XForms by itself is GPL'ed, so the new
non-free?
> package libxforms-perl will be in non-free.
Shouldn't be in non-free.
Either contrib or main, depending on whether it links to XForms
or not (see also my previous post about GPL + XForms
imcompatibility).
Peter
> i indent to package XForms4Perl [1], a nice extension to Perl that
> allows to call the Xforms [2] GUI api from a standard Perl script.
> The package will contain a modification of the original GUI-builder
> fdesign (a converter) to build a GUI and to generate ready-to-go
> Perl-programms.
Cool. I read about it (in LJ?) and promised myself to try it, as
I code Perl but not C. I'm looking forward to this package.
> XForms4Perl is GPL'ed, but XForms by itself is GPL'ed, so the new
> package libxforms-perl will be in non-free.
Does this link to XForms? If so, shouldn't it be GPL + exception
clause, otherwise it's an invalid license?
(This is a can of worms. I don't agree with this interpretation,
neither do lots of people, yet I have bug reports against some of
my XForms-linked packages for that very reason. I'm just trying
to spare you trouble down the road.)