Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Debian 11 Bullseye Setup Problems Error Report

59 views
Skip to first unread message

admin4

unread,
Aug 17, 2021, 6:40:02 AM8/17/21
to

Dear Debian Team,

1) first (always) say something positive

being a big fan of Debian since aprox 10 years

thanks for all your efforts making Debian a easy to install (universal) reliable system, that lowers the bar for users trying to go Open Source and GNU Linux and FreeSoftware (a migration via OSX might be a good transition from Windows)

today was the day trying out the new Debian 11 with LTS (LTS is a reason for users consider switching to Ubuntu, so good choice there)

2) the problems:

E1: (error1) problem: Debian 11 won't install

tested on:

S1: (suggestion1) there needs to be an easy way to report errors

S.1.) include a "report problem" button, that automatic generates a report to store away any error logs (and dmesg) that is generated during the setup on a usb drive, for easy upload to https://debian.org/report-a-problem

or:

S2.) (even better if network works) include a "report problem" button, that automatic generates a report and uploads it to debian.org for further investigation (easily accessible as a link like https://debian.org/errors/report/2021-08-17_11-57_lenovo_x60s_128903786351782539)

Q1: (question1): why is there nor vi nor less included in the setup?

makes debugging things very very hard

please checkout this wonderful script that should run on some console during setup per default

https://dwaves.de/2017/06/15/linux-monitor-all-logs-in-real-time-d-follow-all-show-changes-to-log-files-under-varlog/

which would display all errors (currently via ccze) nicely in RED

for easy visual detection of problems

PS: thanks for rss feed btw this app https://dwaves.de/2021/06/16/how-to-read-news-in-the-21st-century-apps-rss-feeds-turns-the-users-android-based-device-into-an-independent-open-source-based-news-aggregator-that-respects-the-users-privacy/ allows nice following of news such as https://www.debian.org/News/2021/20210814

via rss feed https://www.debian.org/News/news

On 8/17/21 10:32 AM, debian-devel-...@lists.debian.org wrote:
-- 

mit freundlichem Gruß / best regards

https://www.dwaves.de - enact the web
                           connect the people

Paul Wise

unread,
Aug 17, 2021, 10:40:04 PM8/17/21
to
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:39 AM admin4 wrote:

> today was the day trying out the new Debian 11 with LTS (LTS is a reason for users consider switching to Ubuntu, so good choice there)

Debian 11/bullseye is not in LTS mode yet. Debian 10/buster will be in
LTS mode in a year's time when regular security support for it ends.
Debian 11/bullseye will be in LTS mode one year after the release of
Debian 12/bookworm in approximately two year's time.

> 2) the problems:
>
> E1: (error1) problem: Debian 11 won't install

Please ask for help debugging this on Debian support channels and once
you know what the problem is, then file an installation report.

https://www.debian.org/support
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch05s04#submit-bug

> S1: (suggestion1) there needs to be an easy way to report errors

The Debian bug reporting tool is called reportbug, please file issues
using it. If you don't know which package is at fault, you can ask on
our support channels to find out.

https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
https://www.debian.org/support

> Q1: (question1): why is there nor vi nor less included in the setup?

Sounds like a question for the support channel, but I assume it is
because nano is available, which is a user-friendly alternative to vi,
and can also replace less.

--
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

admin4

unread,
Aug 18, 2021, 5:20:02 AM8/18/21
to

Hello Paul,

thanks for the timely reply.

On 8/18/21 4:33 AM, Paul Wise wrote:
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 10:39 AM admin4 wrote:

today was the day trying out the new Debian 11 with LTS (LTS is a reason for users consider switching to Ubuntu, so good choice there)
Debian 11/bullseye is not in LTS mode yet. Debian 10/buster will be in
LTS mode in a year's time when regular security support for it ends.

thanks for the info, alright, sounds good, Debian 10 runs just fine right now :)

Debian 11/bullseye will be in LTS mode one year after the release of
Debian 12/bookworm in approximately two year's time.

2) the problems:

E1: (error1) problem: Debian 11 won't install
Please ask for help debugging this on Debian support channels and once
you know what the problem is, then file an installation report.

https://www.debian.org/support
https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch05s04#submit-bug

S1: (suggestion1) there needs to be an easy way to report errors
The Debian bug reporting tool is called reportbug, please file issues
using it. If you don't know which package is at fault, you can ask on
our support channels to find out.
is this tool available during setup? with no network connection?
https://itsfoss.com/bug-report-debian/


https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting
https://www.debian.org/support

Q1: (question1): why is there nor vi nor less included in the setup?

in theory yes... in reality try this:

wget https://thesquareplanet.com/feed.xml

cat feed.xml |nano # wohooo it works

Too many errors from stdin

Buffer written to nano.save

# argh, only works for small files!?

can not handle large files?



      
Sounds like a question for the support channel, but I assume it is
because nano is available, which is a user-friendly alternative to vi,
and can also replace less.

"Note that your installation report will be published in the Debian Bug Tracking System (BTS) and forwarded to a public mailing list."

"Make sure that you use an e-mail address that you do not mind being made public"

https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch05s04#submit-bug

here we go admin4 into the spam database... for trying to report a problem and improve a GNU Linux distribution.

will try that

cu

Andrey Rahmatullin

unread,
Aug 18, 2021, 5:30:03 AM8/18/21
to
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:54:17AM +0200, admin4 wrote:
> >> Q1: (question1): why is there nor vi nor less included in the setup?
Both are included, less has Priority: standard, vim-tiny has Priority:
important.

> in theory yes... in reality try this:
>
> wget https://thesquareplanet.com/feed.xml
>
> cat feed.xml |nano # wohooo it works
>
> *Too many errors from stdin**
> *
>
> *Buffer written to nano.save*
>
> *# argh, only works for small files!?*
>
> can not handle large files?
vi doesn't support this either. You just shouldn't pipe files to editors
and call `nano feed.xml` instead.

> "Note that your installation report will be published in the Debian Bug
> Tracking System (BTS) and forwarded to a public mailing list."
>
> "Make sure that you *use an e-mail address that you do not mind being
> made public*"
>
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch05s04#submit-bug
> <https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/amd64/ch05s04#submit-bug>
>
> here we go admin4 into the spam database... for trying to report a
> problem and improve a GNU Linux distribution.
Well, you mailed a mailing list directly instead, doing the same thing.

--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc

admin4

unread,
Aug 18, 2021, 6:30:03 AM8/18/21
to
Hello Andrey,

On 8/18/21 11:20 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:54:17AM +0200, admin4 wrote:
>>>> Q1: (question1): why is there nor vi nor less included in the setup?
> Both are included, less has Priority: standard, vim-tiny has Priority:
> important.

after setup is complete yes, but during the setup / when doing a setup
of Debian 11 iso via
https://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/debian-cd/11.0.0/
<https://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/debian-cd/11.0.0/>

during the setup neither less nor vi are available in the consoles (what
gnu linux is used during setup? busybox?)

>> in theory yes... in reality try this:
>>
>> wget https://thesquareplanet.com/feed.xml
>>
>> cat feed.xml |nano # wohooo it works
>>
>> *Too many errors from stdin**
>> *
>>
>> *Buffer written to nano.save*
>>
>> *# argh, only works for small files!?*
>>
>> can not handle large files?
> vi doesn't support this either. You just shouldn't pipe files to editors
> and call `nano feed.xml` instead.

but then nano can not replace less as stated by pa...@debian.org

best regards

Andrey Rahmatullin

unread,
Aug 18, 2021, 6:40:04 AM8/18/21
to
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:25:58PM +0200, admin4 wrote:
> Hello all, in short,
>
> * is there a Debian "testing" team?, that does test setups of Debian
> ISOs on a bunch of different hardware with priority on the most used
> CPUs like amd64 and i386, (free and non-free versions)),
> * before the ISOs spread across the world on all those nice download
> servers, for further "public beta" testing?
> * does-it-work-well.sh script could
> o 1) ask the user if everything works fine (rating from 1 to 5 stars)
> + and user can add a comment ( send some praise or comments
> what does/did not work )
> o 2) scan the hardware specs of the system
> + anonymized! without any serials and mac addresses or ip
> addresses or screen resolutions!, before uploading it to
> debian.org/hardware-compatibility-list
> # where the hardware is marked in green (works) orange
> (can be made to work with this (link) workaround) or red
> (fails, no fix available currently)
Yes, testing the pre-release ISOs and filing installation-report bugs is
encouraged during freezes.

--
WBR, wRAR
signature.asc

admin4

unread,
Aug 18, 2021, 6:50:03 AM8/18/21
to

Hello all, in short,

    • is there a Debian "testing" team?, that does test setups of Debian ISOs on a bunch of different hardware with priority on the most used CPUs like amd64 and i386, (free and non-free versions)),
    • before the ISOs spread across the world on all those nice download servers, for further "public beta" testing?
    • does-it-work-well.sh script could
        • 1) ask the user if everything works fine (rating from 1 to 5 stars)
          • and user can add a comment ( send some praise or comments what does/did not work )
        • 2) scan the hardware specs of the system
            • where the hardware is marked in green (works) orange (can be made to work with this (link) workaround) or red (fails, no fix available currently)

        just trying to help ensure the quality of Debian stays rock solid and frustration free especially for new users, that might not want to wait for days, until a fix is uploaded and then simply go to ubuntu

        but as Debian is the basis for Ubuntu, if Debian is broken, so is then probably Ubuntu

        best regards

        Paul Wise

        unread,
        Aug 18, 2021, 11:20:02 PM8/18/21
        to
        On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 9:12 AM admin4 wrote:

        > cat feed.xml |nano # wohooo it works
        >
        > Too many errors from stdin

        You need to tell nano to load stdin:

        cat feed.xml | nano -

        > here we go admin4 into the spam database... for trying to report a problem and improve a GNU Linux distribution.

        Please note that debian-devel is a public mailing list too, so your
        email is already public.

        Paul Wise

        unread,
        Aug 18, 2021, 11:30:03 PM8/18/21
        to
        On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:42 AM admin4 wrote:

        > is there a Debian "testing" team?

        That is composed of everyone who uses Debian and especially those who
        decide to report an issue they found.

        > that does test setups of Debian ISOs on a bunch of different hardware with priority on the most used CPUs like amd64 and i386, (free and non-free versions)),

        The Debian CD team do installation testing of each new Debian release
        and each new Debian point release. They don't do things like download
        RSS feeds or try to use less/vi in the installer though, they just
        follow the installer prompts.

        https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianCD/ReleaseTesting

        > 1) ask the user if everything works fine (rating from 1 to 5 stars)
        >
        > and user can add a comment ( send some praise or comments what does/did not work )

        I don't think that Debian has enough people to monitor these, we have
        enough bug reports and mailing list/forum posts to keep up with as it
        is.

        > 2) scan the hardware specs of the system

        There is a shared cross-distro hardware database:

        https://wiki.debian.org/Hardware/Database
        https://linux-hardware.org/
        https://bsd-hardware.org/

        Unfortunately the script used to upload to the database, called
        hw-probe, isn't yet integrated into the Debian installer nor the
        Debian live installer (calamares).

        https://bugs.debian.org/964853
        https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues/1454

        > anonymized! without any serials and mac addresses or ip addresses or screen resolutions!, before uploading it to debian.org/hardware-compatibility-list

        The above hardware database uses truncated salted hashes of some
        hardware identifiers, in order to aggregate repeat uploads of hardware
        probes of the same computer.

        https://wiki.debian.org/PrivacyIssues#Data_sharing
        https://github.com/linuxhw/hw-probe#privacy

        > where the hardware is marked in green (works) orange (can be made to work with this (link) workaround) or red (fails, no fix available currently)

        There isn't any way to automatically check if hardware works, you
        would need the user to check each item of hardware, make sure they did
        the check correctly and only then report it working correctly. We
        could create a Debian Live distro for hardware
        testing/compatibility/reporting/certification, but no-one has done
        that yet, although there was an idea and discussion at DebConf to do
        something similar some years ago.

        http://wiki.debian.org/Hardware/Certification

        There is a corner of our wiki where Debian users can report their
        experience with installing Debian, as well as the option to file
        installation reports, which feed back to the installer team.

        https://wiki.debian.org/InstallingDebianOn

        admin4

        unread,
        Aug 19, 2021, 4:20:04 AM8/19/21
        to

        Hello all valuable and constructive contributors :)

        1) so thanks again for Debian it is just a lovely distro

        2) forgot to mention: was using the net install ISOs for the test (hardware used server hp proliant g6 (amd64) (the raid is detected fine!) and lenovo laptop x60s (i386)

        https://ftp.halifax.rwth-aachen.de/debian-cd/11.0.0/amd64/iso-cd/

        1. because they are minimalism
        2. let me install just what is needed
        3. fit on a CD

        testers are an important part of the team :)

        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTFbLyUQSbw

        best regards

        Timothy M Butterworth

        unread,
        Aug 20, 2021, 6:20:03 PM8/20/21
        to
        I have been using Debian 11 since Alpha 1 release. I installed with
        non-free live DVD using the calamaris installer. I have it installed
        on three systems one Intel Celeron, one Intel i5 and one AMD Ryzen 7.

        I give the installer a 5 star rating although I would like to see some
        improvements made to the disk configuration utility. Currently the
        disk configuration utility is non-intuitive and appears to be designed
        for keyboard only navigation as opposed to mouse navigation. No matter
        how many times I use the disk utility I just can not get used to using
        it.

        I have not found any show stopper bugs. I am having an issue in KDE
        Plasma where the desktop fails to load including the wall paper. The
        screen is just black with a functional task bar. Simply logging off
        and logging back in fixes it, so it is just a minor annoyance.

        Having a dedicated email list and IRC channel for installation related
        concerns seems like a good idea. I could see it getting used.

        Tim

        Paul Wise

        unread,
        Aug 20, 2021, 7:00:03 PM8/20/21
        to
        On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 10:15 PM Timothy M Butterworth wrote:

        > I give the installer a 5 star rating although I would like to see some
        > improvements made to the disk configuration utility. Currently the
        > disk configuration utility is non-intuitive and appears to be designed
        > for keyboard only navigation as opposed to mouse navigation. No matter
        > how many times I use the disk utility I just can not get used to using it.

        The issue tracker for the Calamares project is on GitHub:

        https://github.com/calamares/calamares/issues

        > I have not found any show stopper bugs. I am having an issue in KDE
        > Plasma where the desktop fails to load including the wall paper. The
        > screen is just black with a functional task bar. Simply logging off
        > and logging back in fixes it, so it is just a minor annoyance.

        Sounds like something that should be reported upstream:

        https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved#Issue_Reporting
        https://community.kde.org/Get_Involved/Issue_Reporting

        Once it is fixed upstream, you could talk to the Debian Qt/KDE team
        about getting it fixed in the affected Debian versions.

        https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/

        > Having a dedicated email list and IRC channel for installation related
        > concerns seems like a good idea. I could see it getting used.

        For the Debian Live installer, there is the upstream Calamares
        Matrix/IRC room/channel and the debian-live mailing list and IRC
        channel. For the Debian Installer there is the debian-boot mailing
        list and IRC channel.

        https://github.com/calamares/calamares/

        Philip Hands

        unread,
        Aug 21, 2021, 7:40:03 AM8/21/21
        to
        Paul Wise <pa...@debian.org> writes:

        > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:42 AM admin4 wrote:
        >
        >> is there a Debian "testing" team?
        >
        > That is composed of everyone who uses Debian and especially those who
        > decide to report an issue they found.

        While that probably accounts for the bulk of the effort, there are also
        people that work on this within Debian (as mentioned debian-cd does
        testing), and we also have several mechanical testing efforts of various
        sorts-- e.g.:

        https://jenkins.debian.net
        https://reproducible-builds.org/
        https://openqa.debian.net/
        https://ci.debian.net/
        https://salsa.debian.org/salsa-ci-team/pipeline/

        (there are bound to be more that I've forgotten)

        Cheers, Phil.
        --
        |)| Philip Hands [+44 (0)20 8530 9560] HANDS.COM Ltd.
        |-| http://www.hands.com/ http://ftp.uk.debian.org/
        |(| Hugo-Klemm-Strasse 34, 21075 Hamburg, GERMANY
        signature.asc

        admin4

        unread,
        Sep 23, 2021, 6:30:02 AM9/23/21
        to

        GoodDay Mates,

        network connectivity dropping during package download is still there, it is a major problem, sometimes it works, sometimes not, this used to work very well.

        it will especially annoy new users, so this issue need to be debugged & fixed!

        will also write to SpaceX about it (if it has anything to do with their setup)

        the free version iso seems to have have a network problem during package download: (after software selection)

        https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=149974&p=743218#p743218

        trying non-free now.

        tried yesterday and today installing

        https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/cu ... 64/iso-cd/

        on Lenovo t440

        and the problem is still there... this time it downloaded 1388 packages of 1491 before grinding to a halt...

        • after software selection (wanted to try the KDE Desktop, being big MATE fan for it's simplicity) from the default debian package mirror https://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/
        it just stops downloading packages after ~100 packages (loses connectivity) and stays there until timeout[/list]
        • downloading isos via wget from just works fine

        best regards

        -- 
        
        mit freundlichem Gruß / best regards
        
        

        Tomas Pospisek

        unread,
        Sep 23, 2021, 8:20:02 AM9/23/21
        to
        G'day admin4,

        I suggest you take this to the #debian IRC channel where you can
        hopefully drill down to the root cause of the problem. A mailing list
        like debian-devel is not really well suited to do back-and-forth
        debugging...
        *t

        On 23.09.21 12:08, admin4 wrote:
        > GoodDay Mates,
        >
        > network connectivity dropping during package download is still there, it
        > is a major problem, sometimes it works, sometimes not, this used to work
        > very well.
        >
        > it will especially annoy new users, so this issue need to be debugged &
        > fixed!
        >
        > will also write to SpaceX about it (if it has anything to do with their
        > setup)
        >
        > the free version iso seems to have have a network problem during package
        > download: (after software selection)
        >
        > https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=149974&p=743218#p743218
        > <https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=17&t=149974&p=743218#p743218>
        >
        > trying non-free now.
        >
        > tried yesterday and today installing
        >
        > https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/cu ... 64/iso-cd/
        > <https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/>
        >
        > on Lenovo t440
        >
        > and the problem is still there... this time it downloaded 1388 packages
        > of 1491 before grinding to a halt...
        >
        > * after software selection (wanted to try the KDE Desktop, being big
        > MATE fan for it's simplicity) from the default debian package mirror
        > https://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/ <https://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/>
        >
        > it just stops downloading packages after ~100 packages (loses
        > connectivity) and stays there until timeout[/list]
        >
        > * downloading isos via wget from just works fine
        0 new messages