Anyway, it looks like it's going to have to be in non-free. I
contacted the author on the copyright, and this is what he said:
---Marcus Comstedt <mar...@lysator.liu.se> wrote:
> I'm aware that the copyright statement is very fuzzy and I'll try to
> supply a better one in future distributions (if any). Anyway, the
license
> for amiwm does _not_ contain a generic license to produce derived
works
> using my source code. I'll probably grant licenses to specific
derived
> works should someone ask me, but no such license is given implicitly
with
> the software. I'll allow distribution of patches in the form of diffs
> though. My filosofy here is that I don't want people to confuse bugs
> written by other people with the bugs written by me. ;)
Since there's no implicit derived works license, my understanding is
that this contravenes DFSG section #4, which requires an explicit
license (and it would have to be a non-exclusive one).
Anyway, perhaps we need to look at providing a section between
"contrib" and "non-free" that allows for software that is
redistributable without restrictions but is not DFSG-free (i.e. stuff
that people can stick on CD-ROMs without wandering through every
copyright file in non-free), or at least a convention for tagging
non-free packages as CD-ROMable. This would be consistent with our
goal of making it "easy for people to produce CD-ROMs of our system
without violating any licenses, import/export restrictions, or any
other laws" (per Policy) and would not compromise the ideological
purity of the DFSG.
Chris
==
Chris Lawrence Email: qua...@ix.netcom.com
Senior Political Science Major
University of Memphis Contract Programmer
Memphis, Tennessee, USA FedEx - Operations Research
_________________________________________________________
DO YOU YAHOO!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-dev...@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to tem...@bucknell.edu .
[snip]
> Anyway, perhaps we need to look at providing a section between
> "contrib" and "non-free" that allows for software that is
> redistributable without restrictions but is not DFSG-free (i.e. stuff
> that people can stick on CD-ROMs without wandering through every
> copyright file in non-free), or at least a convention for tagging
> non-free packages as CD-ROMable. This would be consistent with our
> goal of making it "easy for people to produce CD-ROMs of our system
> without violating any licenses, import/export restrictions, or any
> other laws" (per Policy) and would not compromise the ideological
> purity of the DFSG.
This has been discussed some time ago when we decided to make "contrib"
packages also DFSG free.
We didn't choose this option (to split non-free into
non-free-but-freely-dist and really-non-free-stuff) since (a) we don't
want to give guidelines for non-DFSG software (this would be against our
project goals) and (b) what's `freely-dist' differs very much from vendor
to vendor (depending on how much they charge, what else is on the CD,
etc.).
Sorry, but I think the amiwm package has to go into "non-free" for now.
Thanks,
Chris
-- _,, Christian Schwarz
/ o \__ sch...@monet.m.isar.de, sch...@schwarz-online.com,
! ___; sch...@debian.org, sch...@mathematik.tu-muenchen.de
\ /
\\\______/ ! PGP-fp: 8F 61 EB 6D CF 23 CA D7 34 05 14 5C C8 DC 22 BA
\ / http://fatman.mathematik.tu-muenchen.de/~schwarz/
-.-.,---,-,-..---,-,-.,----.-.-
"DIE ENTE BLEIBT DRAUSSEN!"