Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

lcms -> lcms2 migration

36 views
Skip to first unread message

Moritz Mühlenhoff

unread,
Dec 29, 2013, 4:40:01 AM12/29/13
to
Hi,
lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev)
The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages.
This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.

I've made a few test builds/conversions (lcms.h -> lcms2.h), which all
went fine (ghostscript, inkscape). I also noted that poppler is fixed
in experimental.

Cheers,
Moritz


Andreas Metzler <amet...@debian.org>
enblend-enfuse (U)

Andreas Tille <ti...@debian.org>
entangle (U)

Ari Pollak <a...@debian.org>
gimp

Arthur Loiret <arthur...@gmail.com>
wine (U)
wine-unstable (U)

Bastien ROUCARIÈS <roucaries.ba...@gmail.com>
ghostscript (U)

Bernd Zeimetz <bz...@debian.org>
gimp-plugin-registry
rawstudio (U)

Daniel Kobras <kob...@debian.org>
graphicsmagick

Dave Beckett <daj...@debian.org>
poppler (U)

David Stone <da...@nnucomputerwhiz.com>
photoprint

Debian CLI Applications Team
<pkg-cli-...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
f-spot

Debian PhotoTools Maintainers
<pkg-photot...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
enblend-enfuse
entangle
rawstudio

Debian Printing Team <debian-...@lists.debian.org>
ghostscript

Debian QA Group <pack...@qa.debian.org>
devil
xsane

Debian Wine Party <pkg-win...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
wine
wine-unstable

Hilko Bengen <ben...@debian.org>
wine (U)

Iain Lane <la...@debian.org>
f-spot (U)

Jay Berkenbilt <q...@debian.org>
nip2

Jonas Smedegaard <d...@jones.dk>
ghostscript (U)

Jordi Mallach <jo...@debian.org>
gimp (U)

Josselin Mouette <jo...@debian.org>
poppler (U)

Kartik Mistry <kar...@debian.org>
libmng

Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) <g...@debian.org>
graphicsmagick

Loic Minier <lo...@dooz.org>
poppler

Matteo F. Vescovi <mfv.d...@gmail.com>
inkscape (U)

Matteo F. Vescovi <mfve...@gmail.com>
entangle (U)

Michael Gilbert <mgil...@debian.org>
wine (U)
wine-unstable (U)

Michael Gilbert <michael....@gmail.com>
ghostscript (U)

Michal ♦iha♦ <ni...@debian.org>
geeqie

Mirco Bauer <mee...@debian.org>
f-spot (U)

Muammar El Khatib <mua...@debian.org>
cegui-mk2

Oleksandr Moskalenko <ma...@debian.org>
scribus

Ove Kaaven <ov...@arcticnet.no>
wine (U)
wine-unstable (U)

Pino Toscano <pi...@debian.org>
poppler (U)

Ross Burton <ro...@debian.org>
poppler (U)

Sebastian Harl <tok...@debian.org>
enblend-enfuse (U)

Steve King <deb...@invux.com>
dcraw

Sven Eckelmann <sv...@narfation.org>
exactimage

Vincent Sanders <vi...@debian.org>
netsurf

Wolfram Quester <wo...@sigxcpu.org>
inkscape


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnlbvr3...@inutil.org

Bastien ROUCARIES

unread,
Dec 29, 2013, 5:50:01 AM12/29/13
to
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> Hi,
> lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev)
> The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages.
> This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.

Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we
should do a transition in newer version. See
http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html
and #701993.

So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ?

Bastien
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAE2SPAaVZ6QgCfFByL3NR+QD...@mail.gmail.com

Moritz Mühlenhoff

unread,
Feb 8, 2014, 8:30:01 PM2/8/14
to
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev)
> > The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages.
> > This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.
>
> Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we
> should do a transition in newer version. See
> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html
> and #701993.
>
> So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ?

Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't hold my breath for the transition
to the new ABI, so moving from lcms1 to lcms2 is probably more important
for now.

Cheers,
Moritz


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2014020901...@pisco.westfalen.local

Thomas Weber

unread,
Feb 9, 2014, 7:10:02 AM2/9/14
to
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928). (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev)
> > > The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages.
> > > This is a headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.
> >
> > Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we
> > should do a transition in newer version. See
> > http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html
> > and #701993.
> >
> > So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ?
>
> Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't hold my breath for the transition
> to the new ABI, so moving from lcms1 to lcms2 is probably more important
> for now.

I have uploaded lcms2 2.5 to delayed/7 yesterday. After consulting with
the maintainer, I have added myself as co-maintainer.

Thomas


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-dev...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20140209120047.GA12676@t61

Jonas Smedegaard

unread,
Feb 9, 2014, 7:50:02 AM2/9/14
to
Quoting Thomas Weber (2014-02-09 13:00:47)
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 02:21:46AM +0100, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:25:48AM +0100, Bastien ROUCARIES wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Moritz Mühlenhoff
>>> <j...@inutil.org> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> lcms needs to go for jessie in favour of lcms2 (#717928).
>>>> (liblcms1-dev -> liblcms2-dev) The maintainer seems MIA, so I'm
>>>> going ahead. Below is a dd-list of affected packages. This is a
>>>> headsup as recommended by policy, I'll file bugs in a few weeks.
>>>
>>> Could you note that lcms2 have some ABI problem, and it seems we
>>> should do a transition in newer version. See
>>> http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/lcms.html and #701993.
>>>
>>> So maybe we should made directly the transition to the new ABI ?
>>
>> Sorry for the late reply. I wouldn't hold my breath for the
>> transition to the new ABI, so moving from lcms1 to lcms2 is probably
>> more important for now.
>
> I have uploaded lcms2 2.5 to delayed/7 yesterday. After consulting
> with the maintainer, I have added myself as co-maintainer.

Great!

That means we can finally get a more recent Ghostscript built, as
tracked in bug#701993.


- Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
0 new messages