Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

RFS: sa-exim -- Use spamAssassin at SMTP time with the Exim v4 MTA

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Magnus Holmgren

unread,
Dec 1, 2006, 9:10:09 PM12/1/06
to
Dear mentors,

it would be most kind if one or more of you could take a look at the new
sa-exim package I've prepared, thereby adopting it. (But don't upload it yet;
I'd like upstream to acknowledge that he knows that I'm adopting it first.)

It can be found at http://www.kibibyte.se/download/debian/, or downloaded
directly with dget http://www.kibibyte.se/download/debian/sa-exim_4.2.1-3.dsc

From changelog.Debian:

* New maintainer (Closes: #352533).
* Updated package description to explain what SA-Exim can do that
exim-daemon-heavy can't, and vice versa (Closes: #378732).
* Added German debconf template translation (Closes: #399963).
Thanks to Matthias Julius.
* Updated Swedish debconf templates.
* Repackaged against pristine upstream tarball.
* Encourage use of ACL variables in sa-exim.conf. Also exclude ::1
from SA scanning.

There are no changes in executable code at this time.

--
Magnus Holmgren holm...@lysator.liu.se
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

Amaya

unread,
Dec 2, 2006, 12:10:26 PM12/2/06
to
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> it would be most kind if one or more of you could take a look at the
> new sa-exim package I've prepared, thereby adopting it. (But don't
> upload it yet; I'd like upstream to acknowledge that he knows that I'm
> adopting it first.)

I'll upload this.
Thanks for giving sa-exim some love!

--
·''`. If I can't dance to it, it's not my revolution
: :' : -- Emma Goldman
`. `' Proudly running Debian GNU/Linux (unstable)
`- www.amayita.com www.malapecora.com www.chicasduras.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ment...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

Magnus Holmgren

unread,
Dec 2, 2006, 3:00:19 PM12/2/06
to
On Saturday 02 December 2006 18:05, Amaya wrote:
> Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> > it would be most kind if one or more of you could take a look at the
> > new sa-exim package I've prepared, thereby adopting it. (But don't
> > upload it yet; I'd like upstream to acknowledge that he knows that I'm
> > adopting it first.)
>
> I'll upload this.
> Thanks for giving sa-exim some love!

Just a sec ... I just remembered that I should upgrade the Standards-Version.

There are also a couple of issues with the greylistclean script. I think I'm
gonna move it from /usr/sbin to /usr/share/sa-exim to avoid having to supply
a manpage for it (it's not supposed to be run manually anyway). Further, the
greylistclean crontab expects spamd to be run as, and therefore the
greylisting tuplets in /var/spool/sa-exim to be owned by, "nobody", who
shouldn't own any files at all. That's of course configurable, but it's not a
recommended default. I don't think sa-exim should put greylisting tuplets and
archived mail under /var/spool, but /var/lib. I don't know if the maintainer
script hacking needed is worth it, though.

--
Magnus Holmgren holm...@lysator.liu.se
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)

"Exim is better at being younger, whereas sendmail is better for
Scrabble (50 point bonus for clearing your rack)" -- Dave Evans

Amaya

unread,
Dec 2, 2006, 6:30:11 PM12/2/06
to
Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Just a sec ... I just remembered that I should upgrade the
> Standards-Version.

Too late, I just uploaded, release often, release soon!
I also emailed you about several issues.

> There are also a couple of issues with the greylistclean script. I
> think I'm gonna move it from /usr/sbin to /usr/share/sa-exim to avoid
> having to supply a manpage for it (it's not supposed to be run
> manually anyway). Further, the greylistclean crontab expects spamd to
> be run as, and therefore the greylisting tuplets in /var/spool/sa-exim
> to be owned by, "nobody", who shouldn't own any files at all. That's
> of course configurable, but it's not a recommended default. I don't
> think sa-exim should put greylisting tuplets and archived mail under
> /var/spool, but /var/lib. I don't know if the maintainer script
> hacking needed is worth it, though.

Just ping me when you have something ready, you can do it privately to
me, and I will upload.

Happy hacking!

Magnus Holmgren

unread,
Dec 2, 2006, 8:50:08 PM12/2/06
to
On Saturday 02 December 2006 03:03, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> From changelog.Debian:
>
> [...]

> * Repackaged against pristine upstream tarball.
> [...]

Nope, not this time. Is it possible to overwrite files already in the archive,
and if so, how? Do I have to modify the upstream version? Neither the NMG
(chapter 8/9) nor the Developer's Reference (5.4, 5.6) are entirely clear on
this matter (it's probably not a common thing to do), but DR section 5.4
suggests that it's possible. Hovever, inst...@ftp-master.d.o said

> Rejected: md5sum and/or size mismatch on existing copy of
> sa-exim_4.2.1.orig.tar.gz.
> Rejected: can not overwrite existing copy of 'sa-exim_4.2.1.orig.tar.gz'
> already in the archive.

I trust Amaya to have uploaded the .orig.tar.gz matching the .changes entry.

0 new messages