Re: Remaining bug in pidgin-skype

[Soren Stoutner]

Yes, you should go through each bug individually and close it if it no longer
applies with a message explaining why.

On Saturday, January 27, 2024 6:05:54 AM MST Patrick ZAJDA wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now pidgin-skype has been sponsored thanks to Gianfranco Costamagna,
> what should I do with remaining?
>
> I have not read all of them yet but after a first look, the major part
> (not to say all) of remaining bugs are not still relevant because
> related to old plugins.
> This seems to be nothing more than common sense, but I prefer to ask the
> question before acting: should I prepare a message and close all bugs
> that are no longer relevant, specifying that only the web plugin is
> available and that the bug should therefore be closed because related
> plugin is not part of the package anymore?
>
> I found information about when a specific fix was implemented but not in
> this kind of case.
>
> Thanks and best regards,
> --
> Patrick ZAJDA


--
Soren Stoutner
so...@stoutner.com

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Hello,

>Now pidgin-skype has been sponsored thanks to Gianfranco Costamagna,
>what should I do with remaining?
>
>I have not read all of them yet but after a first look, the major part
>(not to say all) of remaining bugs are not still relevant because
>related to old plugins.
>This seems to be nothing more than common sense, but I prefer to ask the
>question before acting: should I prepare a message and close all bugs
>that are no longer relevant, specifying that only the web plugin is
>available and that the bug should therefore be closed because related
>plugin is not part of the package anymore?
>
>I found information about when a specific fix was implemented but not in
>this kind of case.
>
>Thanks and best regards,

Looks you already correctly did it :)

thanks!

G.