Package: aplus-fsf-dev
Version: 4.22.1-6
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
The package aplus-fsf-dev does not contain header files required
to compile user-written C subroutines to be called from A+.
These files are not currently packaged at all.
Currently aplus-fsf-dev is an empty metapackage that depends on
other aplus-fsf* packages while the name misleadingly suggests that
it should contain development headers. Moreover, descriptions of
aplus-fsf and aplus-fsf-doc state that aplus-fsf-dev contains the
"development environment" as opposed to the "run-time environment"
provided by aplus-fsf binary package which reinforces that expectation.
I suggest renaming aplus-fsf which contains the interpreter and it's
core libraries to something else (like aplus-fsf-core), using the name
aplus-fsf for a metapackage depending on all the other packages, and
providing development files in aplus-fsf-dev.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=pl_PL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages aplus-fsf-dev depends on:
ii aplus-fsf 4.22.1-6
ii aplus-fsf-doc 4.22.1-6
ii aplus-fsf-el 4.22.1-6
Versions of packages aplus-fsf-dev recommends:
ii xfonts-kapl 4.22.1-6
aplus-fsf-dev suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
listm...@lists.debian.org