Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#1040860: bookworm-pu: package mrtg/2.17.10-5+deb12u1
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Jonathan Wiltshire
Jul 13, 2023, 4:10:05 AM7/13/23
to
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:07:17PM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Older versions of the MRTG on Debian had the /etc/mrtg.cfg configuration
> file. Currently, this file is located in /etc/mrtg/ directory. This PU
> introduces changes from Sid (revision 2.17.10-6) to ask to user if the
> configuration file must be moved to /etc/mrtg/, if it exists in /etc/.
> Some updated and new translations for the debconf template are being sent
> with this PU (from revisions 2.17.10-7 and 2.17.10-8). This PU closes
> #1039103.
Please go ahead.
On aother note, some of the templates look like they would benefit from a
review by debian-l1...@lists.debian.org. That's not necessary for
this upload, just something to consider.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 02:07:17PM -0300, Joao Eriberto Mota Filho wrote:
> [ Reason ]
> Older versions of the MRTG on Debian had the /etc/mrtg.cfg configuration
> file. Currently, this file is located in /etc/mrtg/ directory. This PU
> introduces changes from Sid (revision 2.17.10-6) to ask to user if the
> configuration file must be moved to /etc/mrtg/, if it exists in /etc/.
> Some updated and new translations for the debconf template are being sent
> with this PU (from revisions 2.17.10-7 and 2.17.10-8). This PU closes
> #1039103.
Please go ahead.
On aother note, some of the templates look like they would benefit from a
review by debian-l1...@lists.debian.org. That's not necessary for
this upload, just something to consider.
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
ed25519/0x196418AAEB74C8A1: CA619D65A72A7BADFC96D280196418AAEB74C8A1
Andreas Beckmann
Jul 17, 2023, 11:40:05 AM7/17/23
to
Followup-For: Bug #1040860
That proposed update causes a regression in the piuparts
bullseye->bookworm upgrade test since debsums reports modified
conffiles (while piuparts does not customize any conffile).
My impression is that the unmodified old conffile from bullseye
overwrites the unmodified new conffile from bookworm. #1041332
My suggestion would be to *not* release 2.17.10-5+deb12u1 with 12.1
next Saturday and revisit this for the 12.2 point release.
Andreas
That proposed update causes a regression in the piuparts
bullseye->bookworm upgrade test since debsums reports modified
conffiles (while piuparts does not customize any conffile).
My impression is that the unmodified old conffile from bullseye
overwrites the unmodified new conffile from bookworm. #1041332
My suggestion would be to *not* release 2.17.10-5+deb12u1 with 12.1
next Saturday and revisit this for the 12.2 point release.
Andreas
0 new messages