Bug#813708: autojump: Wrong path for zsh in README.Debian

[Simon Marchi]

Package: autojump
Version: 22.2.4-1
Severity: minor
Tags:

Dear Maintainer,

In /usr/share/doc/autojump/README.Debian, the path to add to .zshrc is
wrong. It should be:

. /usr/share/autojump/autojump.zsh

instead of

. /usr/share/autojump/autojump.sh

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-686-pae (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages autojump depends on:
ii python3 3.4.3-7
pn python3:any <none>

autojump recommends no packages.

autojump suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

[Tanguy Ortolo]

package autojump
tags 813708 moreinfo
thanks

Hello,

Simon Marchi, 2016-02-04 10:48-0500:

>In /usr/share/doc/autojump/README.Debian, the path to add to .zshrc is
>wrong. It should be:
>. /usr/share/autojump/autojump.zsh
>
>instead of
>. /usr/share/autojump/autojump.sh

Well, not exactly. If you look at autojump.sh, you will see that,
depending on the shell you use, it sources autojump.bash, autojump.zsh,
autojump.fish or autojump.tcsh.

While directly sourcing autojump.zsh would work just fine, I find it
easier to have instructions as similar as possible for every shell.

Is there a good reason to change the instructions, for instance if the
current suggestion of sourcing autojump.sh does not work?

--
 ,--.
: /` ) Tanguy Ortolo <xmpp:tan...@ortolo.eu>
| `-' Debian Developer <irc://irc.oftc.net/Tanguy>
 \_

[Simon Marchi]

On 2016-03-31 07:56, Tanguy Ortolo wrote:
> package autojump
> tags 813708 moreinfo
> thanks
>
> Hello,
>
> Simon Marchi, 2016-02-04 10:48-0500:
>> In /usr/share/doc/autojump/README.Debian, the path to add to .zshrc is
>> wrong. It should be:
>> . /usr/share/autojump/autojump.zsh
>>
>> instead of
>> . /usr/share/autojump/autojump.sh
>
> Well, not exactly. If you look at autojump.sh, you will see that,
> depending on the shell you use, it sources autojump.bash,
> autojump.zsh, autojump.fish or autojump.tcsh.
>
> While directly sourcing autojump.zsh would work just fine, I find it
> easier to have instructions as similar as possible for every shell.
>
> Is there a good reason to change the instructions, for instance if the
> current suggestion of sourcing autojump.sh does not work?

You are totally right, I didn't consider that possibility. Sorry about
the noise then.