Hello,
When rebuilt against python-all{,-dev,-dbg} (and thus python2.6) from
Debian experimental (and with python2.6 as the default one), your binary
package contained these files:
[ooo-thumbnailer_0.1~alpha2-1_all.deb]
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ooo_thumbnailer-0.1-py2.6.egg-info
This is an indication of a broken package: Python >= 2.6 does not
look for modules into /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/site-packages/ anymore, but
uses /usr/lib/pythonX.Y/dist-packages/ instead.
How to fix it?
==============
* if your package is using python-central:
- add "XB-Python-Version: ${python:Versions}" to all binary packages
that ship Python modules (.py files) or extensions (.so, including
_d.so) in debian/control, check if it's enough,
- try to convert to python-support[1], check if it's enough,
* add --install-layout=deb to setup.py call and bump minimum required
python{,-all,all-dev} build dependency to 2.5.4-1~, check if it's enough
* ask for help on #debian-python or debian...@lists.debian.org
[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianPython/central2support
--
Jakub Wilk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
* Jakub Wilk <uba...@users.sf.net>, 2009-11-25, 10:06:
>When rebuilt against python-all{,-dev,-dbg} (and thus python2.6) from
>Debian experimental (and with python2.6 as the default one), your binary
>package contained these files:
>
>[ooo-thumbnailer_0.1~alpha2-1_all.deb]
>/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/ooo_thumbnailer-0.1-py2.6.egg-info
The attached patch (against 0.2-1) gets rid of spurious python
build-dependency at all.
If you need a sponsor, feel free to ask at
debian...@lists.debian.org or #debian-python at OFTC.
--
Jakub Wilk
First of all, apologies for the original bug report: it was sent after
automatically building your package, without event looking at the
source; thus the general advice I gave you (to switch from pycentral to
pysupport) didn't have much sense for this particular package.
* David D Lowe <daviddlo...@googlemail.com>, 2010-01-16, 20:33:
I didn't see any your mail at debian-python mailing list, but did see
your RFS at debian-...@lists.debian.org, and the same concern was
raised that worries me: build dependency on python helpers is spurious
and should be dropped.
--
Jakub Wilk
> I didn't see any your mail at debian-python mailing list, but did see
> your RFS at debian-...@lists.debian.org, and the same concern was
> raised that worries me: build dependency on python helpers is spurious
> and should be dropped.
>
Sorry, my mistake, I meant debian-mentors' mailing list.