Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#859346: unar revisions
94 views
Skip to first unread message
David Hedlund
Apr 2, 2017, 1:30:03 PM4/2/17
to
Package: unar
Version: 1.8.1-2
http://unarchiver.c3.cx/formats says that RAR is fully supported "Including encryption and multiple volumes. Can also extract .EXE self-extracting files using RAR."
With my version I could not extract RAR 1.3 and 5.0 archives.
* unar rar50.rar
rar50.rar: Couldn't recognize the archive format.
* unar rar13.rar
rar13.rar: RAR
Archive parsing failed! (File is not fully supported.)
No files extracted.
I got the sample files sent from rarlab.com so they are not corrupt.
#########################
Questions
* Can you please add a new colum, "Revision", in http://unarchiver.c3.cx/formats in this order: "Format, Revision, Support level, Notes"?
* Can you please also state which archives and archive revisions that are supported in each further versions of the package "unar"?
Version: 1.8.1-2
http://unarchiver.c3.cx/formats says that RAR is fully supported "Including encryption and multiple volumes. Can also extract .EXE self-extracting files using RAR."
With my version I could not extract RAR 1.3 and 5.0 archives.
* unar rar50.rar
rar50.rar: Couldn't recognize the archive format.
* unar rar13.rar
rar13.rar: RAR
Archive parsing failed! (File is not fully supported.)
No files extracted.
I got the sample files sent from rarlab.com so they are not corrupt.
#########################
Questions
* Can you please add a new colum, "Revision", in http://unarchiver.c3.cx/formats in this order: "Format, Revision, Support level, Notes"?
* Can you please also state which archives and archive revisions that are supported in each further versions of the package "unar"?
David Hedlund
Apr 4, 2017, 2:40:04 AM4/4/17
to
Debian BTS administrators <ow...@bugs.debian.org>
Is that where I should send my recommendation?
On 2017-04-04 03:21, kr...@ftbfs.org wrote:
Is that where I should send my recommendation?
On 2017-04-04 03:21, kr...@ftbfs.org wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for the suggestion. Documenting which archive versions are supported sounds like a good idea.
I think you should report this to the upstream BTS, though, since we have no control over their website.
--
Matt
Julián Moreno Patiño
Apr 11, 2017, 6:30:03 PM4/11/17
to
tags 859346 + moreinfo
Hello David,
Could you attach the related rar 1.3 and 5 files?
In my local test I can extract that kind of files.
Remember the upstream implemented that in 1.10 version.
Please take a look in changelog from:
http://unarchiver.c3.cx/commandline
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- GPG Fingerprint:
C2C8 904E 314C D8FA 041D 9B00 D5FD FC15 6168 BF60
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
Hello David,
Could you attach the related rar 1.3 and 5 files?
In my local test I can extract that kind of files.
Remember the upstream implemented that in 1.10 version.
Please take a look in changelog from:
http://unarchiver.c3.cx/commandline
Kind regards,
--
Julián Moreno Patiño
Debian Developer
.''`. Debian GNU/{Linux,KfreeBSD}
: :' : Free Operating Systems
`. `' http://debian.org/
`- GPG Fingerprint:
C2C8 904E 314C D8FA 041D 9B00 D5FD FC15 6168 BF60
Registered GNU Linux User ID 488513
0 new messages