Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#530242: disabled fsprotect is not really worth a warning

4 views
Skip to first unread message

martin f krafft

unread,
May 23, 2009, 5:40:07 AM5/23/09
to
Package: fsprotect
Version: 1.0.2
Severity: minor

When fsprotect is not enabled, initramfs says:

Warning: fsprotect: We don't want a fsprotect

I don't think this should be a warning, and I would also remove "a"
in that sentence.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-rc5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core)
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--
.''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> Related projects:
: :' : proud Debian developer http://debiansystem.info
`. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck http://vcs-pkg.org
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

digital_signature_gpg.asc

Stefanos Harhalakis

unread,
May 23, 2009, 6:50:14 AM5/23/09
to
This will be fixed in the next upload.

Thanks!

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

0 new messages