Bug#697960: unblock: fusesmb/0.8.7-1.2

[Gunnar Wolf]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package fusesmb

I just rebuilt fusesmb changing its dependency from fuse-utils (a
virtual package) to fuse. The debdiff between freshly built source
packages is quite trivial:

$ debdiff /var/cache/pbuilder/result/fusesmb_0.8.7-1.{1,2}.dsc
diff -u fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/control fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/control
--- fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/control
+++ fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/control
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@

Package: fusesmb
Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, fuse-utils, samba-common, samba-common-bin
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, fuse, samba-common, samba-common-bin
Description: filesystem client based on the SMB file transfer protocol
fusesmb is a filesystem client based on the SMB file transfer protocol. This
gives the ability to transparently exchange files with Microsoft Windows
diff -u fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/changelog fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/changelog
--- fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/changelog
+++ fusesmb-0.8.7/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+fusesmb (0.8.7-1.2) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Change dependency from fuse-utils (now a virtual package) to fuse
+ (Closes: #697665)
+
+ -- Gunnar Wolf <gw...@debian.org> Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:12:40 -0600
+
fusesmb (0.8.7-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium

* Non-maintainer upload.

However, I must recognize this is *not* the real debdiff, as the build
process regenerates config.{sub,guess}. As it was last built in 2009,
the diff is quite large - but should be meaningless.

Please note that I did the upload to the 5-day delayed queue.

Thanks,

unblock fusesmb/0.8.7-1.2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

[Adam D. Barratt]

Control: tags -1 + moreinfo

On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 18:38 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> I just rebuilt fusesmb changing its dependency from fuse-utils (a
> virtual package) to fuse. The debdiff between freshly built source
> packages is quite trivial:

It's still a real package in wheezy; the concrete package was only
dropped in sid (which is another can of annoying worms).

Admittedly, the change could also be useful for partial upgrades from
wheezy to jessie when the time comes. In any case, we can't unblock it
until it's actually in the archive.

Regards,

Adam

[Salvatore Bonaccorso]

Hi Adam, hi Gunnar

On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 11:52:04AM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 18:38 -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> > I just rebuilt fusesmb changing its dependency from fuse-utils (a
> > virtual package) to fuse. The debdiff between freshly built source
> > packages is quite trivial:
>
> It's still a real package in wheezy; the concrete package was only
> dropped in sid (which is another can of annoying worms).
>
> Admittedly, the change could also be useful for partial upgrades from
> wheezy to jessie when the time comes. In any case, we can't unblock it
> until it's actually in the archive.

Additional note: I brought the issue with fuse to debian-devel[1,2]
and filled a bug #697980 to reintroduce fuse-utils just after the
wheezy release[3].

[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00264.html
[2]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2013/01/msg00265.html
[3]: http://bugs.debian.org/697980

I tried to collect which packages are affected and uninstallable in
unstable.

Regards,
Salvatore