Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#606056: unblock deborphan

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Carsten Hey

unread,
Dec 5, 2010, 8:30:02 PM12/5/10
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock


I uploaded deborphan 1.7.28.1 four days ago to sid and 1.7.28.2 recently
to delayed/7.


Changelog summary for 1.7.28.1:

* Doc fixes
* Translation updates
* Add basic multiarch support


Changelog summary for 1.7.28.2:

* Exclude some false positives from being displayed as orphans when
--guess-* is used.
* Don't let orphaner fail if apt disagrees with dpkg about
essentialness.
* Add options to be used by frontends required for a transition (one
in which the RT is not involved, if done right) that needs to be
finished before someone works on migrating sections to tags.
Having these options in stable is a prerequisite for doing this in
a clean way without breaking partially upgrades.


Please unblock deborphan/1.7.28.1
or unblock deborphan/1.7.28.2


If you want me to upload 1.7.28.2 to incoming (or however this is called
nowadays) please drop me a mail.


Thanks
Carsten

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org

Mehdi Dogguy

unread,
Dec 6, 2010, 5:50:01 PM12/6/10
to
On 12/06/2010 02:20 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.d...@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
>
> I uploaded deborphan 1.7.28.1 four days ago to sid and 1.7.28.2 recently
> to delayed/7.
>
>
> Changelog summary for 1.7.28.1:
>
> * Doc fixes
> * Translation updates
> * Add basic multiarch support
>

FTR, I unblocked deborphan/1.7.28.1. I'll have a look at deborphan/1.7.28.2
once it's accepted in the archive (in 6 days).

>
> Changelog summary for 1.7.28.2:
>
> * Exclude some false positives from being displayed as orphans when
> --guess-* is used.
> * Don't let orphaner fail if apt disagrees with dpkg about
> essentialness.
> * Add options to be used by frontends required for a transition (one
> in which the RT is not involved, if done right) that needs to be
> finished before someone works on migrating sections to tags.
> Having these options in stable is a prerequisite for doing this in
> a clean way without breaking partially upgrades.
>
>

Regards,

--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/

Carsten Hey

unread,
Dec 12, 2010, 4:20:02 PM12/12/10
to
* Mehdi Dogguy [2010-12-06 23:38 +0100]:

> On 12/06/2010 02:20 AM, Carsten Hey wrote:
> > I uploaded deborphan 1.7.28.1 four days ago to sid and 1.7.28.2 recently
> > to delayed/7.
> >
> > ...
>
> FTR, I unblocked deborphan/1.7.28.1.

Thanks, today .1 migrated to testing.


> I'll have a look at deborphan/1.7.28.2 once it's accepted in the
> archive (in 6 days).

I just uploaded .2 to unstable and .3, which includes an updated Catalan
translation, to delayed/0. If you don't like the diff between .1 and .2
we could still get the Catalan translation to testing through t-p-o.


All these versions (1.7.28 to 1.7.28.3) include the following
"features":

* Add random garbage to the keep file when deleting a keep entry.
* Truncate the keep file if editkeep is running whilst upgrading to
a less buggy deborphan release.
* Execute random code if orphaner is running whilst upgrading to
a deborphan release with a different orphaner version.
* Ignore the Enhances field.
* Write to uninitialized memory.


Regards
Carsten

0 new messages