Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#1037087: chromium-l10n: The following packages have unmet dependencies: chromium-l10n : Depends: chromium (< 112.0.5615.138-1~deb11u1.1~) but 114.0.5735.90-2~deb11u1 is to be installed

2 views
Skip to first unread message

Attila Hammer

unread,
Jun 4, 2023, 7:50:04 AM6/4/23
to
Package: chromium-l10n
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

* What led up to the situation?
sudo apt install chromium chromium-l10n command results me following error
message:
"Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
or been moved out of Incoming.
The following information may help to resolve the situation:

The following packages have unmet dependencies: chromium-l10n : Depends: chromium (< 112.0.5615.138-1~deb11u1.1~) but 114.0.5735.90-2~deb11u1 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages."


* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
Simple ran sudo apt install chromium chromium-l10n command.

* What was the outcome of this action?
Previous Chromium and Chromium related language packages are right installed.

* What outcome did you expect instead?

The quoted error message since yesterday.
I am not using pinned repositoryes, holded packages,
simple used standard Bullseye related repositories.


*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.7
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-23-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=hu_HU.UTF-8 (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968) (ignored: LC_ALL set to C), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages chromium-l10n depends on:
pn chromium <none>

chromium-l10n recommends no packages.

chromium-l10n suggests no packages.

Andres Salomon

unread,
Jun 4, 2023, 12:10:04 PM6/4/23
to
Hi Security Team,

Looking at
https://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/main/c/chromium/ , I
see that chromium-l10n built for bookworm (deb12u1) but not for
bullseye (deb11u1). I'm guessing that the arch:all build was
interrupted or is still in a needs-build state or something, but since
it's the security infra I can't see it. Can you please do a giveback or
whatever is needed to get it building, or if something is reproducably
broken with the build please send me the build log?

Thanks,
Andres

Moritz Muehlenhoff

unread,
Jun 4, 2023, 1:30:04 PM6/4/23
to
On Sun, Jun 04, 2023 at 12:06:01PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi Security Team,
>
> Looking at https://security.debian.org/debian-security/pool/main/c/chromium/
> , I see that chromium-l10n built for bookworm (deb12u1) but not for bullseye
> (deb11u1). I'm guessing that the arch:all build was interrupted or is still
> in a needs-build state or something, but since it's the security infra I
> can't see it. Can you please do a giveback or whatever is needed to get it
> building, or if something is reproducably broken with the build please send
> me the build log?

I sent a giveback, let's see what comes out of it.

Cheers,
Moritz

Salvatore Bonaccorso

unread,
Jun 4, 2023, 2:50:04 PM6/4/23
to
Hi Moritz,
Incidently it was asked about it already this afternoon, and did gave
back as well earlier today. But the build failed again. If your
give-back fails as well then we need to fetch the build logs to
understand the failures.

Regards,
Salvatore

inasprecali

unread,
Jun 4, 2023, 4:50:05 PM6/4/23
to
Hi,

I tried installing chromium-l10n again on a freshly updated
Bullseye machine (with the bullseye-security and bullseye-updates
repositories enabled, of course) and this time the operation
succeeded with no conflicts.

Unless there are new reports about this problem persisting, I
think this bug can be closed.

Best regards.
0 new messages