Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#757769: ITP: jitsi-videobridge -- a WebRTC compatible Selective Forwarding Unit that allows for multiuser video communication
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Damian Minkov
Aug 11, 2014, 5:20:02 AM8/11/14
to
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damian Minkov <dame...@jitsi.org>
* Package name : jitsi-videobridge
Version : 202
* URL : https://jitsi.org/jitsi-videobridge
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a WebRTC compatible Selective Forwarding Unit that allows for multiuser video communication
Jitsi Videobridge is a WebRTC compatible Selective Forwarding Unit (SFU) that allows for multiuser video communication. Unlike expensive dedicated hardware videobridges, Jitsi Videobridge does not mix the video channels into a composite video stream. It only relays the received video flows to all call participants. Therefore, while it does need to run on a server with good network bandwidth, CPU horsepower is not critical for performance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Damian Minkov <dame...@jitsi.org>
* Package name : jitsi-videobridge
Version : 202
* URL : https://jitsi.org/jitsi-videobridge
* License : LGPL-2.1
Programming Lang: Java
Description : a WebRTC compatible Selective Forwarding Unit that allows for multiuser video communication
Jitsi Videobridge is a WebRTC compatible Selective Forwarding Unit (SFU) that allows for multiuser video communication. Unlike expensive dedicated hardware videobridges, Jitsi Videobridge does not mix the video channels into a composite video stream. It only relays the received video flows to all call participants. Therefore, while it does need to run on a server with good network bandwidth, CPU horsepower is not critical for performance.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Phil Morrell
Feb 13, 2021, 6:50:03 PM2/13/21
to
Control: block -1 by 892842
thanks
> Nowadays the video bridge had been rewritten and has fewer
> dependencies. I'm also not sure about the state of Kotlin, is it yet
> in the repos, cause it is one of the dependencies?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760485#54
thanks
> Nowadays the video bridge had been rewritten and has fewer
> dependencies. I'm also not sure about the state of Kotlin, is it yet
> in the repos, cause it is one of the dependencies?
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=760485#54
Sunil Mohan Adapa
Mar 29, 2021, 1:20:03 AM3/29/21
to
retitle 757769 ITP: jitsi-videobridge -- a WebRTC compatible Selective
thanks
I am working on packaging Jitsi Videobridge as part of Java Packaging
Team. Jitsi has many dependencies these are now tracked on the wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/RequestedPackages/Jitsi
Thanks,
--
Sunil
Forwarding Unit that allows for multiuser video communication
owner 757769 !
thanks
I am working on packaging Jitsi Videobridge as part of Java Packaging
Team. Jitsi has many dependencies these are now tracked on the wiki:
https://wiki.debian.org/Java/RequestedPackages/Jitsi
Thanks,
--
Sunil
Petter Reinholdtsen
Nov 19, 2021, 2:50:03 PM11/19/21
to
Happy to report that the jitsi-videobridge dependency kotlin just made
it into unstable.
<URL: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kotlin >
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
it into unstable.
<URL: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/kotlin >
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
James Valleroy
Mar 26, 2023, 10:53:06 AM3/26/23
to
retitle 757769 RFP: jitsi-videobridge -- a WebRTC compatible Selective
thanks
While some progress was made on packaging dependencies [1], there is
still significant work needed, and this effort has been stalled for a
long time now. So it is more accurately an RFP at this point.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Java/RequestedPackages/Jitsi
Forwarding Unit that allows for multiuser video communication
noowner 757769
thanks
While some progress was made on packaging dependencies [1], there is
still significant work needed, and this effort has been stalled for a
long time now. So it is more accurately an RFP at this point.
[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Java/RequestedPackages/Jitsi
0 new messages