Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#834478: debirf: additional rescue packages
8 views
Skip to first unread message
Matt Taggart
Aug 29, 2016, 7:30:02 PM8/29/16
to
diskscan would be another good package for the rescue image. It's better
testing tool than badblocks (but I'd still keep badblocks in the image).
--
Matt Taggart
tag...@debian.org
testing tool than badblocks (but I'd still keep badblocks in the image).
--
Matt Taggart
tag...@debian.org
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Aug 30, 2016, 3:00:04 AM8/30/16
to
On Mon 2016-08-29 19:21:49 -0400, Matt Taggart wrote:
> diskscan would be another good package for the rescue image. It's better
> testing tool than badblocks (but I'd still keep badblocks in the image).
I'm pretty sure diskscan is already in the rescue image in 0.36:
> diskscan would be another good package for the rescue image. It's better
> testing tool than badblocks (but I'd still keep badblocks in the image).
0 dkg@alice:~/src/debirf/debirf$ git checkout debirf/0.36
HEAD is now at 5d3a285... debian: add NEWS entry about new package include/exclude
0 dkg@alice:~/src/debirf/debirf$ git grep diskscan
debian/changelog: * added diskscan to rescue (Closes: #803792)
doc/example-profiles/rescue/packages:+diskscan
0 dkg@alice:~/src/debirf/debirf$
--dkg
Matt Taggart
Aug 30, 2016, 3:10:03 AM8/30/16
to
checked and the git repo I was pointed at was git://finestructure.net/debirf
which only has up to 0.35. That's the first one listed on the webpage...
git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/debirf seems to have 0.36.
Which is canonical?
Anyway I double checked and none of the other suggested additional packages
listed in this bug were in the lair git repo.
--
Matt Taggart
tag...@debian.org
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
Aug 30, 2016, 3:40:04 AM8/30/16
to
On Tue 2016-08-30 03:02:14 -0400, Matt Taggart wrote:
> Ah I thought I remembered seeing it too but it wasn't in git. But I just
> checked and the git repo I was pointed at was git://finestructure.net/debirf
> which only has up to 0.35. That's the first one listed on the webpage...
>
> git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/debirf seems to have 0.36.
>
> Which is canonical?
debcheckout debirf
> Ah I thought I remembered seeing it too but it wasn't in git. But I just
> checked and the git repo I was pointed at was git://finestructure.net/debirf
> which only has up to 0.35. That's the first one listed on the webpage...
>
> git://lair.fifthhorseman.net/~dkg/debirf seems to have 0.36.
>
> Which is canonical?
points to https://anonscm.debian.org/git/collab-maint/debirf
This was announced on the development mailing list back in May:
https://lists.mayfirst.org/pipermail/debirf/2016-May/000021.html
> Anyway I double checked and none of the other suggested additional packages
> listed in this bug were in the lair git repo.
thanks,
--dkg
0 new messages