Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#773063: pre-approval unblock: quotatool/1.4.12-1.1
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Jan Wagner
Dec 13, 2014, 4:40:03 PM12/13/14
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Could you please state if you would approve to update the quotatool
package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a blocking release in
unstable.
This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack for jessie
again as the package is actually not in testing.
changelog:
quotatool (1.4.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Adding debian/patches/ignore_initramfs.diff takes from upstream
(Closes: #711502)
The full debdiff stat is:
changelog | 7 ++
patches/ignore_initramfs.diff | 138
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
patches/series | 1
3 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
More details can be found at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711502#24
The source debdiff is attached.
If you achnowledge this upload, I would change distribution and upload
this via tpu.
Many thanks, Jan.
--
Never write mail to <wa...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS
PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Severity: normal
User: release.d...@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Could you please state if you would approve to update the quotatool
package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a blocking release in
unstable.
This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack for jessie
again as the package is actually not in testing.
changelog:
quotatool (1.4.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Adding debian/patches/ignore_initramfs.diff takes from upstream
(Closes: #711502)
The full debdiff stat is:
changelog | 7 ++
patches/ignore_initramfs.diff | 138
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
patches/series | 1
3 files changed, 146 insertions(+)
More details can be found at:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=711502#24
The source debdiff is attached.
If you achnowledge this upload, I would change distribution and upload
this via tpu.
Many thanks, Jan.
--
Never write mail to <wa...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V- PS
PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Jonathan Wiltshire
Dec 13, 2014, 6:30:03 PM12/13/14
to
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Could you please state if you would approve to update the quotatool
> package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a blocking release in
> unstable.
>
> This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack for jessie
> again as the package is actually not in testing.
Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package that was
removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think people might be
surprised that we shipped without a working quotatool.
However I'm not prepared to accept it through t-p-u. The version in
unstable should be reverted with an epoch, and get the full 10 days ageing
period.
(The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload" signed by the
maintainer, defeats me completely...)
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
> Could you please state if you would approve to update the quotatool
> package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a blocking release in
> unstable.
>
> This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack for jessie
> again as the package is actually not in testing.
removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think people might be
surprised that we shipped without a working quotatool.
However I'm not prepared to accept it through t-p-u. The version in
unstable should be reverted with an epoch, and get the full 10 days ageing
period.
(The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload" signed by the
maintainer, defeats me completely...)
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51
Jan Wagner
Dec 14, 2014, 7:20:04 AM12/14/14
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package that
> was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think people
> might be surprised that we shipped without a working quotatool.
Yes, thats true. Looking into popcon[1] seems to indicate that it is
not an uncommon package. And without (a working) quotatool it seems
very unlikely that whole quota in jessie is usable.
Cheers, Jan.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=quotatool
- --
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=jYn1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Hash: SHA256
Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package that
> was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think people
> might be surprised that we shipped without a working quotatool.
not an uncommon package. And without (a working) quotatool it seems
very unlikely that whole quota in jessie is usable.
Cheers, Jan.
[1] https://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=quotatool
- --
Never write mail to <wa...@spamfalle.info>, you have been warned!
- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V-
PS PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
- ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL++++ P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M V-
PS PE Y++
PGP++ t-- 5 X R tv- b+ DI D+ G++ e++ h---- r+++ y++++
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=jYn1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Bas Zoetekouw
Dec 16, 2014, 4:40:04 PM12/16/14
to
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hi Jan, Jonathan,
Hash: SHA256
On 14-12-2014 12:54 , Jan Wagner wrote:
> Hi Bas,
>
> Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
> Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:
>> On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote:
>>> Could you please state if you would approve to update the
>>> quotatool package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a
>>> blocking release in unstable.
>>>
>>> This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack
>>> for jessie again as the package is actually not in testing.
>
>> Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package
>> that was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think
>> people might be surprised that we shipped without a working
>> quotatool.
>
>> However I'm not prepared to accept it through t-p-u. The version
>> in unstable should be reverted with an epoch, and get the full
>> 10 days ageing period.
Jonathan, thanks for allowing this. I'm aware that I've left
>>> Could you please state if you would approve to update the
>>> quotatool package via testing-proposed-updates, as there is a
>>> blocking release in unstable.
>>>
>>> This NMU is fixing #711502 and provides a working quota stack
>>> for jessie again as the package is actually not in testing.
>
>> Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package
>> that was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think
>> people might be surprised that we shipped without a working
>> quotatool.
>
>> However I'm not prepared to accept it through t-p-u. The version
>> in unstable should be reverted with an epoch, and get the full
>> 10 days ageing period.
quotatool to rot for way too long :(
> it would be nice if you could handle that.
>
>> (The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload"
>> signed by the maintainer, defeats me completely...)
>
> I think it would be more reasonable for RM when the actual
>> (The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload"
>> signed by the maintainer, defeats me completely...)
>
> maintainer can deal with this?
Sure, I will take this up. Hopefully, I'll be able to upload a
reverted, epoched version by tomorrow.
Thanks Jan, for contacting the release tema on my behalf!
Bas.
- --
Bas Zoetekouw
And what shoulder and what art
Could twist the sinews of thy heart?
And when thy heart began to beat
What dread hand and what dread feet?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)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=8kHu
Jonathan Wiltshire
Dec 16, 2014, 4:50:05 PM12/16/14
to
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 10:20:56PM +0100, Bas Zoetekouw wrote:
> > it would be nice if you could handle that.
> >
> >> (The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload"
> >> signed by the maintainer, defeats me completely...)
> >
> > I think it would be more reasonable for RM when the actual
> > maintainer can deal with this?
>
> Sure, I will take this up. Hopefully, I'll be able to upload a
> reverted, epoched version by tomorrow.
Please remove the moreinfo tag and send a debdiff of this upload relative
> > it would be nice if you could handle that.
> >
> >> (The confusion behind 1.6.2-1.1, a "non-maintainer upload"
> >> signed by the maintainer, defeats me completely...)
> >
> > I think it would be more reasonable for RM when the actual
> > maintainer can deal with this?
>
> Sure, I will take this up. Hopefully, I'll be able to upload a
> reverted, epoched version by tomorrow.
to the previous Jessie candidate (i.e. skip out the new upstream release in
between) when it's ready.
0 new messages