Hi Daniel,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 1:36 AM Daniel Kahn Gillmor
<
d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
> looks like PyPDF2 2.12.1 is the last version before a major
> (backward-incompatible) change in 3.0.0. and PyPDF2 3.0.0 itself
> indicates that it is deprecated in favor of pypdf 3.x
Indeed, that's the last backward compatible release.
> I've prepared some packaging for PyPDF2 2.12.1-0.1 and put it in salsa
> at
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pypdf
Cool! But I still haven't checked. Hopefully I will check tomorrow morning.
> If that's someplace that you'd be up for collaborating, i'd be happy to
> help out on it with you there.
I'm not sure if we know each other, but I have the knowledge that you
are a nice guy. Sure, I'm open to collaboration and Salsa is a good
place to start.
> We can probably also use the same repository (just different branches)
> for packaging pypdf, since i would expect that packaging to just inherit
> directly from the pypdf2 packaging, and it can be nice to have the
> history in the same location.
I'm not sure what would be the best practices for this case, but
definitely a continued packaging is preferred from my side.
> Let me know if that's something you'd be up for collaboratong on,
> László!
I'm even open to you taking over the package and making me an uploader.
> If you don't like it, i'm also happy to remove the repo from salsa. I
> defer to you as the maintainer here.
To be honest, I was going to look for an adopter for this package
this summer, probably after migrating it to src:pypdf. If you are
interested, even contributed already to the project then you are the
best candidate. As noted, you can take over immediately while leaving
me as an uploader for a while.
Best,
Laszlo/GCS